New Lawsuit. 
In addition to Orly Taitz's Lightfoot v Bowen, here is   Broe v Reed?

Sunday, December 07, 2008


Despite all efforts by big media, big blogs, Democrafascists, and Republican cowards to ignore or worse quash  the story, the folks just want to know.

Broe v Reed? (hat tip

December 6, 2008

James Broe and 11 other Washington voters have filed in Washington’s Supreme Court to have the votes cast for Senator Obama set aside, because he failed to establish that he was even an American citizen running under his own name at the time of the election, let alone a “natural born citizen” as required by the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other cases that have been dismissed for lack of standing, these plaintiffs have standing under a unique Washington statute that allows any registered voter to challenge the election of someone who, at the time of the election, was ineligible to hold the office.

The Secretary of State’s office has already admitted it did nothing to determine Senator Obama’s eligibility, and Senator Obama hasn’t produced a single piece of evidence to prove he was born in the United States that would establish his eligibility, although the burden to prove his eligibility was placed on him by the rules of the national Democrat Party. Counsel for the plaintiffs Stephen Pidgeon had only a two word comment: “case closed!”

Attorney at Law, P.S.

Documents in Broe v Reed?:

Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Application for Writ of Mandamus
BROE v. REED Summons

OT but related:Group seeks to have state's votes for Obama set aside

Washington residents say Democrat never established he is natural-born American citizen hat tip OCM

Lightfoot v. Bowen: A new lawsuit

and Bill Richardson calls Obama an immigrant ...