Schedule, Section 19.
"This constitution, when enrolled and signed, shall be deposited by the president of this convention, in the office of the governor of this territory, and in the event of its adoption by the people, the governor shall send a copy thereof to the president of the United States, with the request that he submit the same to congress, together with our request that the state of Washington be admitted into the union. There shall be sent, at the same time, a copy of the act of the legislative assembly of this territory, entitled "An Act to provide for calling a convention to frame a constitution for the state of Washington", and submitting the same to the people for ratification or rejection, approved November ninth eighteen hundred and seventy seven, and also a certified abstract of the votes cast for and against this constitution."

"It has been well said, by one of the ablest judges of the age,
that a "constitution is not to receive a technical construction,
like a common law instrument or a stature. It is to be
interpreted so as to carry out the great principles of the
government, not to defeat them." Per Gibson, C.J. in
Commonwealth v. Clark, 7 Watts & S. (Pa.), 133. Butler V.
Com. of Pennsylvania, 51 U.S. 402 (1850)

"Criminals are a small minority in any age or community. And the harm they have done to mankind is infinitesimal when compared to the horrors – the bloodshed, the wars, the persecution, the famines, the enslavements, the wholesale destruction – perpetrated by mankind’s governments. Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights - When unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is men’s deadliest enemy." Ayn Rand

"A MYTH is a LIE

But Myths are propagated by those who have a DUTY to know the
TRUTH But choose to LIE to deceive those they have a Duty to.

Told often enough by those in positions of trust to those who do not
have a duty to know better, the Myth begins to take on the color, or
appearance, of Truth.

This is a list (see below) of the MYTHS commonly utilized by
Attorneys to deceive their clients and by those the public has trusted to
SERVE as an Official in OUR Courts, to deceive the public, in
violation of their fiduciary duty."

Source material: https://www.informed.org/MYTHS.htm

Link here to read the hard truth about above statement and more -

https://www.informed.org/MYTHS.htm

Web Site Documentary Abstract - Short Version:

The highest charters and actions of the land, e.g. the Laws of
Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution have been laundered into a vast hierarchy of illegitimate municipal corporations using corrupted constitutions written by "powerful" political and legal elite's, who were NOT given such authority nor jurisdiction by the common people. "They exceeded their power by very far". They did not draft true and honest constitutional republics.

Closed door secret sessions with agendas framed up property taking articles by intentionally leaving out and/or scrubbing out, property protecting rights for which there was no authority or jurisdiction given by the people, or the highest charters and action of the nation.

The vast majority of the state natural born Citizenship have been duped. The drafters and their "delegates" were "soiled"
with political agenda, historical ignorance plus illegitimate power and uncontrollable greed.

New state Citizens were duped.

Duped - 1. a person who is easily deceived or fooled; gull. 2. a person
who unquestioningly or unwittingly serves a cause or another person: a
dupe of the communists. 3. to make a dupe of; deceive; delude; trick.

The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, College Edition

Web Site Documentary Abstract - Long Version

Neither State of Washington "Constitutions", 1878 or 1889, or
the current 2010 version of the 1889 Constitution amended near
100 times, meet the hard and honest standards of a true and
honest Constitutional Republic. The union of the states and the
states were mandated to conform strictly to a Constitutional
Republic standard. This never happened.

The 1889 more illegitimate and complete rewrite of the original 1878, more legitimate State of Washington Constitution, scrubbed out significant key provisions regarding individual rights.

Constitutions of the several states including their union of the
states, CANNOT be framed using the very tyranny the highest
charters and actions of the land condemned, i.e.

• the Laws of Nature and Nature's God,
• the Declaration of Independence,
• the spirit and success of the American Revolution and
• the Christian heritage of the American people

Current state constitutions are framed more as a combination of municipal corporation by-laws and constitutional gulags which
became the root for all evil and takings through the revised codes
of each state.

This will become self evident as you read this material and
connect all the constitutional dots of taking. You and your family,
your property, your unalienable rights and your traditions were
clearly brokered away by soiled territorial and ensuing state
governors, THEIR "delegates", THEIR "constitutions" and
THEIR municipal corporations.

There were only 21 pages in the "more legitimate" 1878 Constitution vs. 111 pages in the 1889 complete rewrite "more illegitimate" version.
Constitutions are written to serve the natural born not enslave them, but this never happened.

Constitutions cannot be orchestrated, delegated, written, rewritten or amended to go against the natural born state Citizens unalienable rights who are the true and honest settlers and creators of the
states.

Nor can these charters go against the highest laws of the land, i.e. The Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence
and the success and intent of the American Revolution.

"The Constitution is not an instrument or the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
Patrick Henry

1783 Paris Peace Treaty

"Prior to the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which signified the end of the
Revolutionary War, land in the rebelling States was owned
in part by the King of England. The King granted rights and
privileges related to these lands in the rebelling States following the
historic British pattern.

However within the Treaty of Paris the King gave up his sovereign
ownership of the land. In this way most lands in the States became
the property of sovereign individuals (not governments) without
any State rights to taxation. People dwelling in the US have
unlimited right to contract, many freeholders exercised that right
by exchanging municipalities the right to taxation in exchange for
benefits from sharing resources with their neighbors.

This practice was adopted in large scale during the Great
Depression as counties DECEPTIVELY began to bill allodial
landowners taxes and offered services in exchange for payment
without giving notice that such payment might imply transfer of
allodial owner from the individual to the State.

Deceit is a form of Fraud and thus this deceptive practice did not
in fact transfer allodial title, thus today, as in Noah Webster's day,
in the United States, most lands are allodial as denoted by the
words "fee simple" or (FREE OF FEE).

https://www.ezgeography.com/encyclopedia/Allodium

"His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz,
New-Hampshire, Massachusetts-Bay, Rhode-Island and
Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey,
Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North-Carolina,
South-Carolina, and Georgia, to  be free, sovereign and
independent States; that he treats with them as such; and for
himself, his heirs and successors, relinquishes all claims to the
government, proprietary and  territorial rights of the same, and
every part thereof."

Great article by Larry Becraft: https://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/WeAintBrits.htm

"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."

Patrick Henry

"The state constitutions in this country grant and limit the powers of the several departments of government, but, generally speaking, they are not to be considered as the origin of liberty or rights. [ Ex parte Quarg, 149 Cal. 79, 84 P. 766, 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 183, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 9 Ann. Cas. 747; People v. Warden of City Prison, 154 App. Div. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 29 N.Y.Cr. R. 66.] But with more particular reference to the rights called natural, it must now be remarked that they exist before constitutions and independently of them. Constitutions enumerate such rights and provide against their deprivation or infringement, but do not create them. It is supposed that all power, all rights, and all authority are vested in the people before they form or adopt a constitution. By such an instrument, they create a government, and define and limit the powers which its agencies are to exercise, and they also specify the rights which the constitution is to secure and the government respect. But they do not thereby invest the citizens of the commonwealth with any natural rights which they did not before possess. This is shown by the provision found in the constitutions of many of the states that the enumeration, in the Bill of Rights, of particular rights or privileges shall not be construed to impair or derogate from others retained by the people."

Constitutions

CONSTITUTION, government. The fundamental law of the state, containing the principles upon which the government is founded, and regulating the divisions of the sovereign powers, directing to what persons each of these powers is to be
confided, and the, manner it is to be exercised as, the Constitution of the United States.

The words constitution and government are sometimes employed to express the same idea, the manner in which sovereignty is exercised in each state. Constitution is also the name of the instrument containing the fundamental laws
of the state.

By constitution, the civilians, and, from them, the common law writers, mean some particular law; as the constitutions of the emperors contained in the Code.

John Bouvier A Law Dictionary 6th Edition 1856

"As noted above by the famous John Bouvier, a Constitution's essential element is that it is, "…containing the principles upon which the government is founded, and regulating the divisions of the sovereign powers…

" You will note that in Bouvier's definition, nothing appears about regulating Citizens. That is because, at least in a free nation, it is The People, in agreement with each other, who create the Constitution for the sole purpose of establishing, defining, and limiting the scope of government."

Constitutions

A Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as representatives of the people, and MUST GOVERN according to existing constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.

A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United States. However in recent years, many people have criticized the federal government for moving away from a Constitutional Republic, as defined by the Constitution, and towards a pure democracy.

TeamLaw.org defines a Constitutional Republic as follows:

A Republic, by definition, has two principle elements. First, it is controlled by Law; therefore, it does not control Law. Second, it recognizes the private independent sovereign nature of each
person (man or woman) of competent age and capacity; therefore, a Republic must be representative in its nature.

A Republic recognizes Law is unchangeable, or at least that it can only be changed by a higher source than government. In a Republic the concept of “collective sovereignty” cannot exist,
except with recognition that the State or nation, as a body of sovereigns, can speak through one elected voice; though that one voice can never lawfully interfere with the private rights of
the individual sovereigns.

“A Constitutional Republic” is a government created and controlled, at least, by the Law of a Constitution. The Constitution of the United States of America was, in Law, a foundation based on the Bible, the Magna Charta and the
Declaration of Independence. Those documents recognize man’s sovereignty, the divine nature of man’s creation and man’s divine right to Life, Liberty, the means of acquiring and possessing Property, and the pursuit of happiness.

Table data from https://www.supremelaw.org

Jacks' comments: American's live in a Constitutional Republic NOT a democracy, huge difference. In a democracy, the citizens are slaves of the elites who control the cities, counties, state and the Mother of all municipal corporations, District of Columbia, USA Inc.

In a true and honest (self-evident) Constitutional Republic, the constitutions of each state and the union of the states must be strictly framed to the highest standards of a Constitutional Republic wherein each INDIVIDUAL natural born state Citizen is given absolute free choice as a King or Queen and a Son and Daughter of the land.

The use of "majorities" and "minorities" through a representative limited Constitutional Republic apply primarily to commerce between the states, issues with foreign governments, and protecting the independence of the states NOT to the individual rights, liberty, freedom and private property of the sons and daughters of the land. True and honest charters of free nations strictly limit government, NOT the natural born state Citizens who are born free and sovereign protected by Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the success and intent of the first American Revolution.

Tyranny of government was clearly condemned in the Declaration of Independence and the action of rebellion and success of the American Revolution. The natural born fought and died to free themselves from ALL forms of tyranny, taxing and taking of property and their traditions.

Constitutions of the land have NOT been honestly framed to protect all these unalienable rights. They have in fact been better framed to take everything versus protecting them.

"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine."

Thomas Jefferson

"The American people had fought and won the War for Independence in order to escape from the corrupt English court system. But in less that ten years, the same antiquated system was forced upon them."

"The Constitution That Never Was" Ralph Boryszewski, Page 11

"These new Constitutions are not "constitutions" in the true sense. A true Constitution creates a government of, by, and for, The People; The People being the de jure Citizens of that society/community/nation. These new Constitutions are actually nothing more than "statutory laws" that are dressed up as Constitutions and referred to as such. The original Constitutions of states admitted to the Union before the Civil War (1861-1865)
are based on the fundamental beliefs and concepts espoused in the Declaration of Independence. State constitutions drafted after the Civil War must be studied with a careful eye."

Constitutions

"In America, we now have three forms of Constitutions in operation. The first is the original [de-jure] Constitution of a state. Unless one initiates a court action that relies upon a provision of an original Constitution, the states now function exclusively upon
the second form of Constitution - the new state Constitutions for federal citizens. The third form is the federal Constitution."

Constitutions

"Because the states no longer actively function on their original Constitutions, they only amend the newer ones. In accordance with the limited protections of federal citizens, amendments to these newer Constitutions can address virtually any issue and can impose restrictions and limitations that are not enforceable upon de jure state Citizens."

Constitutions

Please link here for a beautiful write up of this great man

Jack's comments:

To better understand how constitutions are manipulated & used against the natural born
state Citizens vs. protecting us, please scan or read the following four Spooner classic
works or print them out via your nearest copy center and read on the fly. This will alter
your perspective of constitutions forever and well worth your time.

You have to ask yourself, why would an ex PA in Cook County Attorney's Office and
now Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory teaching constitutional law, go to so
much trouble erecting a physical and web site monument to this outspoken legal genius,
who died in obsurity.

And the answer is, Lysander Spooner was prophetic and far ahead of his time and ours.
No one in his day and few in our day, could comprehend the weight of the hard truth, he
wrote. He is "A Lawyer For All Seasons", whose spirit is still alive in the truth he left
behind 149 years ago, for those with open minds and hearts to see.

Above One Paragraph Abstract

"Those who framed the U.S. Constitution were accused of exceeding their power by very far."
This is a key piece of the puzzle to fully comprehend. A handful of very prominent men rammed
through an idea to centralize control of 13 independent republics and commonwealths and their
territories thereof, using the collateral fear from nearly loosing the American Revolution. They
used violence, secret meetings, back room deals, voting fraud, predetermined agenda tactics, big
city power politics, without full authority of their applicable state legislatures & the natural born
citizens therein. All while stampeding the people away from a very simple original idea of a single
purpose government limited to the regulation of trade ONLY funded with a 5% tax on imposts
into a central all powerful government, i.e. our current form of a  "Constitutional Republic by tyranny.

This is NOT the way it was suppose to be, NOR is it too late to change.

"The Constitution is not an
instrument for the government
to restrain the people, it is an
instrument for the people to
restrain the government."

-- Patrick Henry

"The state constitutions in this country grant and limit the powers of the several departments of government, but, generally speaking, they are not to be considered as the origin of liberty or rights. [Ex parte Quarg, 149 Cal. 79, 84 P.
766, 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 183, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 9 Ann. Cas. 747; People v. Warden of City Prison, 154 App. Div. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 29 N.Y.Cr. R. 66.]

But with more particular reference to the rights called natural, it must now be remarked that they exist before constitutions and independently of them. Constitutions enumerate such rights and provide against their deprivation or infringement, but do not create them. It is supposed that all power, all rights, and all authority are vested in the people before they form or adopt a constitution."

Constitutions

Section 3. is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"The people of the state, in their right of sovereignty, are declared to possess the ultimate property in and to all lands within the jurisdiction of the state, and all lands, the title to which shall fail from a defect of heirs, shall revert or escheat to the state. "

Jack's comments: Eminent domain replaced the Law of Mortmain of England. Eminent domain destroys your allodial rights and goes against the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the success
and intent of the American Revolution. This is one of many conflicts written into the US and state constitutions for profit and power going against the higher laws of the land.

Article V of the U.S. Constitution Bill of Rights "nor shall property be taken for public use without just compensation" does NOT infer private property will be taken by force NOR
does it infer private property can be taken.

Once again, we have been duped.

Section 23 is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"All lands within the state are declared to be allodial, and feudal tenures, with
all their incidents, are PROHIBITED. Liens and grants of agricultural lands for
a longer term than fifteen years, in which rent or services of any kind shall be
reserved, and all fines and like restraints upon alienation reserved in any grant
of land hereafter made, are declared to be void. "

Jack's comments: Please note definitions for "allodial" and "feudal" follow.

The reasons for the act of the American Revolution were clearly laid out in the
Declaration of Independence. The American Revolution was to free us
from ALL tyranny. Your land, home, labor, possessions, vehicles and animals
are all private property which are natural rights given to you by birth, as a
natural born state Citizen in America. They are secured from taking by the act
of the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence and the Laws of
Nature and Nature's God. Constitutional conventions and their resulting
"constitutions" CANNOT take or war upon these God given and unalienable
rights.

If we in fact do not have allodial title and the natural born do, in fact, pay taxes
(tribute) on property (land, home, labor, equipment, animal, transportation), then
we do NOT live in a Constitutional Republic. Those charged with protecting us
from these takings, have betrayed us, i.e. committed treason.

The Constitution of the several states was never fully ratified by the 13 states or
the 3 million some colonists at the time of the initial signing. The Bill of Rights
was left out for 2 years and then it was only amended in, as a very limited
straw horse vs. much stronger full articles. The direct tax taking clauses were
never wanted nor were they approved but they were forced in the constitution.
(see references at link below Freedom From Taxes.

The worst fears of the Federalists (pro strong central government) came
true and the concerns of those against the union of the "states" were prophetic. The
fix was in before the original constitutional convention of the several states began.
This same political staging of taking property and everything we rightfully,
completely and absolutely own without allodial rights was illegitimately and
fraudulently written into the State of Washington Constitutions in 1878 and in 1889
and continues illegitimately to this day, 132 years later.

Article I. Declaration of Rights
Section 5. Freedom of Speech - 2nd 1889 Constitution
"Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right."

ALLODIAL. Free; not holden of any lord or superior; owned without obligation of vassalage or fealty; the opposite of feudal...

ALLODIUM. Land held absolutely in one's own right, and not of any lord or superior; land not subject to feudal duties or burdens. An estate held by absolute ownership, without recognizing any superior to
whom any duty is due on account thereof...

Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 2003

allodial ... Free; not held subordinately; opposed to "feudal." In England, all lands are held by the crown, and none are allodial. In the United States, all lands have been allodial since the American Revolution.

allodium ... An allodial estate; an estate not held under a superior.

Ballentine's Law Dictionary 1948

Team Law Open Forum

"So far as we are aware, virtually all of the occupied land in Washington State is secured by Land Patent. Thus, all landowners in Washington are land patent secured landowners, whether they are aware of that and have accepted that fact or not."

ALLODIUM estates. Signifies an absolute estate of inheritance, in contradistinction to a feud.

2. In this country the title to land is essentially allodial, and every tenant in fee simple has an absolute and perfect title, yet in technical language his estate is called an estate in fee simple, and the tenure free and common socage. 3 Kent, Com. 390; Cruise, Prel. Dis. c. 1, 13; 2 Bl. Com. 45. For the etymology of this word, vide 3 Kent Com. 398 note; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1692.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition

"All lands within the state are declared to be allodial, and feudal tenures are prohibited. On this point counsel contended, first, that one of the principal elements of feudal tenures was, that the feudatory could not independently alien or dispose of his fee; and secondly,
that the term allodial describes free and absolute ownership, ... independent ownership, in like manner as personal property is held; the entire right and dominion; that it applies to lands held of no superior to whom the owner owes homage or fealty or military service, and describes an estate subservient to the purposes of commerce, and alienable at the will of the owner; the most ample and perfect interest which can be owned in land."

Barker v Dayton 28 Wisconsin 367 (1871)

Allodial: Land ownership that is unfettered, outright and absolute. It is the opposite of the feudal system as it supposes no obligation to another (i.e. a lord).

When the USA broke away from England, the unfettered use and charging of land by the owner was a primary objective.

https://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/A/Allodial.aspx

Blacks Law Dictionary 2nd Edition 1910

Section 11 is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"There shall never be in this state, involuntary servitude, save as punishment for crime, where the party shall have been duly convicted."

Section 18 is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution.

"All laws in the possession, enjoyment and decent of the property, shall be alike applicable to resident aliens and citizens."

"The legislature shall determine WHAT PERSONS constitute the militia of the state, and may provide for organizing and disciplining the same in such manner as may be prescribed by law."

"I feel that we should place in the constitution only those provisions that are fundamental. Is it fundamental that the militia be called the National Guard for all time to come? Are the details
of the organization of the militia as set forth in the article fundamental? I challenge the chairman to show me any constitution that contains any such provision. I think this is a step toward military despotism." As a result of these objections the
article on the militia was shorn of its objectionable features, and its organization left out the legislature."

One delegate's comments undermining the intent and meaning of militia. Reference at link below. (Jack's comment)

The United States Constitution, Article I. Section 8.

"TO PROVIDE FOR organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States
respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;.."

Jack's comments: the militia is any able bodied natural born American state Citizen who wishes to fight and die for their family, freedom, liberty, property, traditions and happiness. The legislature cannot "determine what persons" they may ONLY
"provide for.."..see quote below. Local militia groups of property owners, Citizens and their families determine who shall fight.

This is a classic example of how State pre selected political "delegates" usurp our rights one word at a time by exercising ignorance of history and/or agenda over their mandate. They have
no option but to "provide for..", vis-a-vis they cannot "determine" nor can they "may provide".

Once the local militia is taken over by the State, protection of local and individual natural born property owners private and public property is quickly removed. Sound familiar? The state
protects no one else but Herself and Her Municipal Corporate property. The State of Washington has a net worth of some $132 billion and an annual growing revenue of 60 some billion.

A so called "representative" system represents the municipal and private corporations and their networks of associations foremost, NOT the founding and fundamental charters protecting your life, liberty and property they were charged and sworn to do.

"Senator Orrin G. Hatch & attorney (Utah) January 20, 1982,
The Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States
Senate, of the Ninety Seventh Congress, Second Session,
report on "The Right to Keep and Bear Arms":

"Subsequent legislation in the second Congress likewise supports the interpretation of the Second Amendment that creates an individual right. In the Militia Act of 1792, the second Congress defined "militia of the United States" to include almost every free adult male in the United States. These persons were obligated by law to possess a firearm and a minimum supply of ammunition and military equipment. This statute, incidentally, remained in effect into the early years of the present century as
a legal requirement of gun ownership for most of the population of the United States. There can be little doubt from this that when the Congress and the people spoke of a "militia", they had reference to the traditional concept of the entire populace
capable of bearing arms, and not to any formal groups such as what is today called the National Guard. The purpose was to create an armed citizenry, which the political theorists at the
time considered essential to ward off tyranny. From this militia, appropriate measures might create a "well regulated militia" of individuals trained in their duties and responsibilities as
citizens and owners of firearms."

Article VI. Legislative, Section 34 of the original 1878 Constitution is also
MISSING from the 1889 Constitution.

"The legislature shall pass laws defining the personal and property rights of
married women."

The privilege of the debtor to enjoy the necessary comforts of life shall be recognized by wholesome laws, exempting a reasonable amount of property from seizure or sale, for the payment of any debt or liability
hereafter contracted. 

Jack's comments: you can read the tone of the banksters and government agent interests securing their property as "creditors". We are conditioned to think usury interest, taxes and regulation are legitimate and necessary upon the natural born State Citizens, while in fact they are NOT.

Liability for illegitimate taxes, illegitimate regulations and usurious interest conflicts with the act of the American Revolution, the intent of the Declaration of Independence and the Laws of Nature and Nature's
God. The constitution of the union of the states and the individual states cannot violate these higher charters. Constitutions cannot be framed up to authorize or give jurisdiction to what these higher charters and acts of the land condemn and forbid.

Nor can they entrap natural born state Citizens into so called adhesion contracts. These takings of property are NOT necessary and fraudulent. Constitutions have been framed up to launder property, unalienable
rights and traditions into illegitimate debt, usurious interest, legal fiction codes and regulations, hich the common natural born people never agreed too.

Article XII Finances, Section 17. of original 1878 Constitution has been altered such as to erode its original meaning.

"Private property, shall not be taken or sold for the payment of the corporate debt of municipal corporations."

ARTICLE XI, Section 13 of 1889 "Constitution"
COUNTY, CITY, AND TOWNSHIP ORGANIZATION

" PRIVATE PROPERTY, MAY BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC DEBT. Private property shall not be taken or sold for the payment of the corporate debt of any public or municipal corporation, except in the mode provided by law for the levy and collection of taxes."

Jacks's Comments:

Note the above added extension (underlined) on the
sentence completely nullifying the original 1878 Constitution meaning. This was not amended, it was rewritten and no one knew any different.
The natural born state Citizens were not fully informed.

The municipal corporate states, counties and cities live off of a tyrannical racketeering extortion model using illegitimate and needless taxes, usurious interest and criminal regulatory confiscations of property for their profit and power.

"The state constitutions in this country grant and limit the powers of the several departments of government, but, generally speaking, they are not to be considered as the origin of liberty or rights. [ Ex parte Quarg, 149 Cal. 79, 84 P. 766, 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 183, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 9
Ann. Cas. 747; People v. Warden of City Prison, 154 App. Div. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 29 N.Y.Cr. R. 66.] But with more particular reference to the rights called natural, it
must now be remarked that they exist before constitutions and independently of them. Constitutions enumerate such rights and provide against their deprivation or
infringement, but do not create them. It is supposed that all power, all rights, and all authority are vested in the people before they form or adopt a constitution."

Constitutions

Second Treatise of Government, John Locke

The 1889 "Constitution" was published and used as the root of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and the existence of this constitution was never published in the US Congressional records,
researchers can find.

Regarding the new 1889 "Constitution"

"The debates and proceedings of the convention were never published."

The following document, linked below, is a thesis of a student for a Master of Arts degree in the University of Washington.

"The debates and proceedings of the convention were never published. Mr. Lebbeus J. Knapp gleaned information from survivors of the convention
and newspapers of that day."

The Origin Of The Constitution Of The State Of Washington

"There were stenographic notes taken of the proceedings of the convention but were never published. They should be for the use of lawyers and courts and all others interested, for, in the rendition of judgments, the bare reading of the words of the constitution gives rise to divided opinions as to the actual meaning contained therein, and, in instances of the kind, it is always the practice of the legal profession to procure information of the intent of
the framers of the constitution. To the average lay mind the importance of securing at first hand the "intent" of the constitutional convention may not appear of so much importance, but every lawyer in the state will appreciate
the value it will be to the courts. Outside of this, however, the general public would be interested in learning the influence brought to bear on us in forming the different sections."

The Origin Of The Constitution Of The State Of Washington

Extract from a UW student's Masters of Arts Thesis re. the new 1889 State of Washington Constitution".

"A very distinguished lawyer chosen by the state prepared the full draft of the constitution taken from the organic laws of Oregon, Wisconsin and Iowa, supplemented with such original Clauses as many years of experience in legislation and the interpretation of laws led him to consider desirable in a state constitution, while no part of the document prepared by Mr. Hill was adopted verbatim. Its source and merit were such that it received the unbiased consideration of the
members of the convention, and it probably contributed more to the finished product as adopted by the convention than any other written document. Mr. Hill's draft of a constitution was published on July 4,
the date of the convening of the convention; it at once attracted the attention of all members, and copies of it were eagerly sought and read by the members present." pg. 17

The Origin of the Constitution of the State of Washington

"The specific work of the convention may be summarized as follows: It met simultaneously with the constitutional conventions of Montana, Idaho, North Dakota and South Dakota." Pg. 26

The Origin of the Constitution of the State of Washington

Jack' comments:
One lawyer drafted the 1889 State of Washington Constitution using boiler plate wording from three other state constitutions which were also probably written by other "very distinguished lawyers" along with "many years of experience" from preceding states.

The stark differences in the two Washington State constitutions (1878 & 1889) is as if the 1878 version was involved less by state appointed attorneys and the 1889 version was written entirely by one.

American's have idolized "their" "constitutions" into literal states of romantic whimsy which have NO connection to the highest laws of the land which condemned most of these takings, i.e. the Declaration of Independence and the act of the American Revolution and the Laws of Nature and Nature's God.

re. the new 1889 "Constitution"

The four pages of signatures in the 1889 "Constitution" are not connected to the document and there is no heading where the signatures begin. There is a blank page in-between the end of the document and the Certificate "We, the undersigned". It's like they got the signatures from somewhere else and wrote a "Constitution" in front of the names.

Mr. Voorhees. "Mr. Speaker, in response to the observations of the chairman of the Committee on Territories, I desire to state that Washington did adopt a constitution in 1878, and the only reason we are
not before Congress today asking for action upon that constitution is that, because of the policy of non-action which has characterized Congress in connection with this matter, we have grown away from the constitution made in 1878. For that reason, and for that reason alone, we are not here with a constitution." Congressional Record - House January 28, 1879

Mr. Voorhees is Senator Daniel W. Voorhees of Indiana (D)

Jack's comments: One comment made regarding why the 11 year delay between 1878 and 1889 constitutions, was the U.S. House was controlled by the Democrats and the Territory of Washington was Republican
during this time. The data and link below appear to confirm this. Of the 7 terms during this period, the Democrats controlled the House 5 times. In the Senate, the Republicans controlled or were even with the
Democrats 5 times. The Republicans controlled the Office of the President 5 terms. There was a window during 1881-1883 when the U.S. House, Senate and Executive office were Republican, however it appears
no action was taken?

re. the new 1889 "Constitution"

"In reply to the first proposition, I find upon a careful examination of those solutions of the revised statutes of the United States which vest the executive power of a territory in the governor, that no authorization exists therein which empower the executive to call such convention by proclamation or otherwise."

"In none of the above material sections, nor in any other statute that I have examined, can I find even a semblance of authority empowering the governor to call a constitutional convention by the exercise of any prerogative consequent upon his executive power."

Attorney General Washington Territory J. B. Metcalfe

Shortly after January 26, 1889

Jack's comment: In Washington State, we have federal military troops occupying Ft. Lewis & McChord AFB and the Bangor submarine base all reporting to the President in Washington D.C. Inc. The State National Guard are currently under the State Governor. Ex Governor Locke has let slip in one of the prior CAFR's, that the "State" of Washington is a corporation under the District of Columbia. According to one National Guard officer I spoke too, there have been at least one attempt to nationalize the State National Guard units under the Office of the President.

We all remember New Orleans with the handcuffing of home owners, et al.

Jack's comments:

Notice that there is no wording in the current 2nd state of Washington Constitution confirming the jury has the right to decide the law and fact for libel and/or criminal cases.

According to "The History Of American Constitutional or Common Law" by Dale Pond, et al, (pgs. 104 - 126) many state constitutions including Maryland & Wyoming, declare juries shall decide the law and fact in criminal cases but other state constitutions limit these natural rights to libel cases only.

Article VII. Revenue and Taxation, State of Washington 1889 Constitution, Amended some 100 times

"The word "property" as used herein shall mean and include everything whether tangible or intangible, subject to ownership. All real estate shall constitute one class: "

Jack's comments:

The so called "delegates" of the second "more illegitimate" undocumented convention have also "exceeded their power by very far" not unlike the accusation during the original constitutional conventions. Very limited Constitutional Republic's, cannot draft rape, pillage and plunder into even a legitimate constitution. Would you tell "your delegate" they could take"everything"? This is political corruption at it finest. The Political territorial elite brokering away your life, liberty, freedom including but NOT limited to your property and wages. No natural born Citizens have a clue. The chosen
few "delegates" have gone along to get along, for your sake of course.

This is another example how the union has exceeded their powers:

"In 2005 the Gold Anti-trust Action Committee sent a letter to the U.S. Treasury Department asking about the risk of gold confiscation.  In its return letter, the Treasury Department asserted its right not only to confiscate
precious metals and restrict ownership of mining shares, but to confiscate and restrict every other financial asset as well.

If you are truly concerned about government confiscation, you need to ensure that your sheriff and state attorney general are committed to protect your constitutional and property rights within their jurisdictions."

Catherine Austin Fitts - https://solari.com/solari_silver_gold/FAQ/#fractional

Jack's comments:

Catherine Austin Fits comments shown to give you the enormity of the taking.

The Taking of Private Property for Public Use

"Most of the constitutions now in force prohibit the taking of private property for public use without compensation, BUT experience has demonstrated that such a general provision is entirely inadequate to prevent great injustice, and often the most
serious oppression.

The taking of private property in many cases is of even less consequence than the injuries inflicted by the use of adjacent property; so, in many state constitutions, provision is made for the that class of cases by adding the words :or damaged.", in order
that the rights of the individual to the enjoyment of his possessions shall not be invaded and he be wrongfully deprived of his property by measures not falling literally within the prohibition
against taking private property."

The Origin of the Constitution of the State of Washington

ENABLING ACT

" AN ACT to provide for the division of Dakota into two States and to enable the people of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Washington to form constitutions and State governments and to be admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States,
and to make donations of public lands to each States.

....And IF the constitutions and governments of said proposed States are republican in form, AND IF ALL the provisions of this act have been complied with in the formation thereof, it shall be the duty of the President of the United States to issue his proclamation nnouncing the result of ....."

Approved February 22, 1889. 25 U.S. Statutes at Large, c 180 p 676. President's proclamation declaring Washington a state: 26 St. at Large, Proclamations, p 10, Nov. 11, 1889.

Following paragraph from above Enabling Act

"Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the inhabitants of
all that part of the area of the United States now constituting the Territories of Dakota, Montana, and Washington, as at present described, MAY become the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Washington, respectively,, as hereinafter provided."
Approved February 22, 1889

"The research team has copies of congressional documents which unequivocally state that the legislature of a state and any actions of the legislature are held in abeyance as saving NO force of law, until that states's constitution is presented to and published by Congress and subsequently the state is accepted into the union of states. It now appears that only the Walla Walla 1878 Constitution meets all of these criteria." (see reference in link below)

"The incorporation of cities and towns by special act of the legislature, has, in many instances, proven to be a fountain of evil in the states where it prevails. There is no branch of government more completely adapted to the purposes of those who make the filthiest a trade than the manipulation of city charters, where their enactment is controlled by special laws."

"The Origin of The Constitution of The State of Washington", by Lebbeus J. Knapp, page 16. This report was prepared as a thesis for the Master of Arts degree in the University of Washington. The debates and proceedings of the convention were never published. Mr. Knapp gleaned information from survivors of the convention and newspapers of that day. Link directly below.

Mr. Kinnear was a member of the Constitutional
Convention and was Chairman of the Committee on Corporations other than Municipal."

Jack's comments: I have long researched the historical justification of power of the city and county councils, mayors and executives.

Bottom line, the natural born did NOT give them this power.

The dark side of municipal corporations have not only "exceeded their power by very far", they have fabricated absurdities and atrocities against property and business owners which ONLY apply to the
employees of the municipal corporations themselves . How ironic and karmic is this hard truth? This trick is another cookie cutter shell game used throughout the conventions.

Once YOU have this enlightenment and make this mental shift of power from them to YOU, you have the truth. YOU and WE never gave them that power, i.e. they stole it.

True and honest Constitutional Republics or Consolidated Republics, prevent and severely punish this empire building. Again, we see the lineage of these type of takings threading to the British monarchy
feudal tyranny. This negative heritage was severed after the success of the American Revolution in the Battle of Yorktown in October 19, 1781, as well the treaties acquiring all other American territories.

2013-02-07 Washington Counties 1880

(Credit to https://freedomrequireswork.org/public_access/washington/washington_counties_1880.pdf)

The taking of property can only be understood once you have the big picture in mind. Before you assemble the pieces of a complex puzzle, it helps to see the picture on the cover of the puzzle box first. This web site is that picture on the cover. Here is more essential research designed to help YOU see this picture.

A Republic, by definition, has two principle elements,

First, it is controlled by Law, therefore it does not control Law.

Second, it recognizes the private independent sovereign nature of each person (man or woman) of competent age and capacity, therefore a Republic must be representative in its nature.

A Republic recognizes Law is unchangeable, or at least that it can only be changed by a higher source than government.  In a Republic the concept of “collective sovereignty” cannot exist, except with recognition that the State or nation, as a body of sovereigns, can speak through one elected voice;  though that one voice can never lawfully interfere with the private rights of the individual sovereigns.

“A Constitutional Republic” is a government created and controlled, at least, by the Law of a Constitution.  The Constitution of the United States of America was, in Law, foundationally based on the Bible, the Magna Charta, and The Declaration of Independence.  Those documents recognize man’s sovereignty, the divine nature of man’s creation and
man’s divine right to Life, Liberty, Property, and the pursuit of
happiness.

Team Law https://www.teamlaw.org/Government/ConstitutionalRepublic.htm

Constitution of the United States of America

Article IV. Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.

9. Coming up - Next web site documentary will be on the State of
Washington and King County Municipal Corporations Consolidated Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) and how the State {that never was} has accumulated massive wealth of some $62 billion annual gross
revenue with a net worth of some 132 billion and growing. All while telling you they have "deficit", i.e. they did not steal from you what they wanted.

The State of Washington Municipal Corporation is far more wealthy and powerful than The Boeing Company. The Boeing Company after some 100 years finally woke up. Boeing could NOT compete with the
State of Washington municipal corporation so they bid themselves out to a much higher bidder.

The states need NO direct taxes, NO till taxes or NO income taxes of any kind upon the natural born State Citizens or the natural born property owners. Does a mob need to extort the local merchants to stay
in business?

A Treatise on the Corruption of Constitutional Conventions in the
Several States

Please read/scan this treatise, if you haven't already done so. Part of the constitutional big picture is to grasp how the "delegates" of the several states and the Federalist leaders far exceeded any power or
authority given to them by the common people. The common people did not vote, nor did their Republic's or Commonwealth's for such a massive centralization of power and property. Does this sound familiar?

This same Ole "constitutional" shell game has been rolling through each territory and their ensuing states since. Another name for this game is "Bait and Switch".

The corruption of the original U.S. constitutional conventions was not uncommon of the politics used by the British to secure their interests in holding their colonies in line. The American politicians, British
educated lawyers and bankers learned these ways of holding agenda "conventions" to draft "constitutions"to manipulate the political infrastructure of the several states as well as the future territories.

We have a "Constitutional Republic" in name only.

FreedomForAllSeasons

• 42 cases in the U.S. Supreme Court AND
• 11 cases in the Federal Circuit Court

Jack's comments:

If all of the above does not boil your blood AND you still believe in the status quo, then here is more proof of the municipal Mother of all embezzlements and larceny.

The states and THEIR municipal corporations (cities and counties) are required even by their own self protective denial, to publish CAFR accounting of THEIR assets, revenue, debt and resulting net worth.

NET WORTH = ASSETS - LIABILITY

Read about the massive reserve on hand cash in the State of Oregon below. The State of Washington is no piker either. "The State of Washington", a subsidiary to Washington D.C. Municipal Corporation, a.k.a. USA Inc. has accumulated $132 billion of Net Worth and $62 billion in annual revenue and growing.

No direct or indirect taxing of the natural born state Citizens is necessary. All direct AND indirect taxing upon the natural born, sovereign and free state Citizens goes against the fundamental laws of the land, i.e. the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the success and spirit of the first American Revolution. All forms of taxing upon the natural born is unnecessary, repressive and destructive.

"Of course there is LAW in this country (Larceny And Willingness)

Did you hug your local government appointed or elected attorney today that are running the complete show in Government at this time?

If not, you probably had good probable cause not to."

Walter Burien - CAFR1

TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612

Son of the Republic Look and Learn - The Vision of George Washington (click)

"The scene instantly began to fade and dissolve, and I at last saw nothing but the rising, curling vapor, I at first beheld. This also disappeared, and I found myself once more gazing upon the mysterious visitor who, in the same voice I heard before said,

"Son of the Republic, what you have seen is thus interpreted: Three great perils will come upon the Republic. The most fearful for her is the third. But the whole world united shall not prevail against her. Let every child of the Republic learn to live for
his God, his land and Union."

With these words the vision vanished, and I started from my seat and felt that I had seen a vision wherein had been showed me the birth, progress, and destiny of the United States."