The following procedures have been recently developed by a seasoned legal researcher for dealing with the illegal and Unconstitutional "census" now in progress, whether the ACS or the new long form. They are provided for information and educational purposes only, and may not be construed as personal legal advice, but are passed on for our mutual edification, and for research, adaptation, and use by freedom loving Americans everywhere. We ask that you copy and distribute this information widely, with that you join in resisting this Unconstitutional, invasive, intrusive, and illegal attempt to coerce free people to sign forced confessions and report private details of their lives to God only knows who, for clearly nefarious purposes.


    While it does help to have your property properly posted, (contact NARLO for signs), because you have every right to stop them at the gate and to charge anyone who violates the state and federal trespassing laws a $5,000 land use fee per person per day or any part thereof, it also helps to know what to do, and it's fine if you don't think you can handle it verbally, to prepare written notice to hand them when/if they violate your rights by knocking on your door. You MUST disrupt their control drama immediately, either verbally or by written notice. DO NOT invite them in, as this is consent to search in law. Have a camera and a hand-held voice recorder ready. Take their picture first. Ask them for ID, and when they show you a phony plastic employee or contractor badge or business card, ask them if they can cash a check with that, inform them that you require bona-fide state issued ID, and if they hand it to you, ask them to wait while you copy the information, and do it.
    IF you have your property properly posted, ask them if they are literate, and read English well, then ask them to go and digest your posting while you make a record of their information. DO NOT be threatening, abusive or rude in any way. If they will not positively identify themselves, ask them if they understand they are required by law to present positive identification, tell them there are reports of impostors engaged in criminal activities. (Consider this such a report -and don't forget how many people have been raped and killed by imposter police officers).
    At this point, politely tell them they are on notice that you do not consent to any violations of your rights protected under the Fourth Article in Amendment against unlawful search of your property, including the fact they are denied permission to take any electronic readings or photographs upon your private property. Ask them if they understand, then ask them if they already have, and if they have, ask them to delete such illegal intrusions upon your protected rights of privacy immediately. Should they state they have and refuse to delete them, ask them if they understand you are making a record of their refusal.
    Now if they try to interview you, notify them that pursuant to the Fifth Article In Amendment to the Constitution For the United States of America, you are invoking your right to decline to participate in any discovery, interview, or fact-finding process, and ask them politely if they understand it is a violation of your federally protected rights to proceed.

    Depending upon their response and demeanor, you may wish to ask them if they realize what they are doing is WRONG and if they understand why.

    ALWAYS ask them to provide all forms before they leave, tell them you will respond appropriately and lawfully by mail within a reasonable time, and ask them to affirm that they understand this and will note it upon their log for that day they are required to keep, together with the fact you have requested not to have further visits, under penalty of law. IF you will bother to Google "public servant questionaire", have that ready, and ask them to fill it out and return it within ten days for your protection. They won't but they will read it, and pass it around.

    There is MUCH, much more you can do with FOIA requests to fend off any further harassment, but you will have to study that out for yourselves. It's out there. Look.


    Invoke your fifth amendment right not to sign forced confessions or participate in interrogation; your fourth amendment right to a search warrant BEFORE invading your privacy; and, as applicable, your first amendment right, pursuant to your firmly and sincerely held religious and/or moral convictions, not to participate; all in writing on the form, then disclose ONLY the number of people in your household, citing to and quoting the U.S. Constitutional authorization for that. Write "N/A" for ALL other questions, do NOT sign it, but do fill in the physical address, and if for any reason you should feel compelled to sign it, print the words, "under protest and without prejudice, all rights reserved" next to or under your signature line. It is far better, legally, to PRINT your name and "signature and consent refused". It is your "response" that the statute, (which has no underlying constitutional authorization of law, and would make a very interesting test case, which is why they have NEVER prosecuted anyone, but only rely upon threat and coercion to exact compliance from the fearful), "requires". NOT the information requested, which the statute does not specifically authorize them to ask.

    Return by certified mail, and keep a copy of the on-line tracking delivery confirmation for your protection from any future claim of non-compliance.

  3. THE LAW

    Pursuant to Title 13 U.S.C., Sections 141, 193, and 221, the Census Bureau is authorized to both conduct the decennial census and collect related preliminary and supplementary information.

    Sec. 193. Preliminary and supplemental statistics

    In advance of, in conjunction with, or after the taking of each census provided for by this chapter, the Secretary may make surveys and collect such preliminary and supplementary statistics related to the main topic of the census as are necessary to the initiation, taking, or completion thereof.

    there is absolutely no underlying constitutional authorization of law, or specific statutory authorization, for the information they are "requesting", and that information is directly violative of very specifically applicable constitutional provisions.

    "..and supplementary statistics related to the main topic of the census as are necessary to the initiation, taking, or completion thereof."

    That is counting heads, beginning, and completing, the administration of that task.

    This statute cannot be remotely even construed, (by the cannons of statutory construction), to include in the invasive and illegal interrogations they are attempting to conduct by coercion, under color of law!

    What is the main topic as definitively defined in our Constitution? Enumeration! Period!

    That quote is so totally ambiguous and overbroad in application to what they are attempting to cram down our throats, by any measure of tests for challenges to statutes set forth in case law, as to not only be unintelligible as to any stated requirement not directly related to counting heads by any reasonable person; but grants over-broad discretionary powers to any prosecuting authority, (for starters), which will carve it into grated crap for disposal if it is challenged, and they don't want that, because its game over.

    Sec. 141 says, in part (I don't see any other reference to data beyond a count):

    In connection with any such census, the Secretary is authorized to obtain such other census information as necessary.

    Ok, prove how the number of toilets I have is "necessary." It is NOT "census information"!

    Sec. 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers

    (a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.
    (b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a) of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is false, shall be fined not more than $500.
    (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no person shall be compelled to disclose information relative to his religious beliefs or to membership in a religious body.

    This is why you use N/A (not applicable), to frame the argument, in answer to the illegal questions on the form. Your Constitutions state clearly they are not applicable to the authorized Census.

    Worst case, are the remaining shreds of your Liberty and Republic worth $100 to you?

    I don’t know about you, but my sincerely and firmly held moral and religious beliefs dictate that I must obey conscience and the Law of God when evil men and usurpers violate my fundamental compacts. ALL of the unconstitutional and illegal interrogation upon their form is directly relative to and subject to my religious beliefs!

    Do you perish for lack of knowledge, or still tremble in your shoes at the mighty paper tiger? Read on, and light his ass on fire if he tries to bite.

    Knowing violation of rights, knowledge of the law in official capacity and negligence to stop or correct a known wrong, upon notice of such with proof of record, as such neglecting to uphold an oath of office, initiates a Title 18, USC, 1621 perjury of oath of office, which offence carries a five year prison term. Under federal authority of Title 42 USC, you have knowledge of the law and are therefore authorized to notify the offender that it has failed to stop and correct the wrong. By federal authority, you give notice under Title 42, USC 1986 for knowledge of the law, as to high standards of the law imposed upon all tasked to enforce any law, and for the "negligence" to prevent a U.S. constitutional wrong from injuring a citizen.
    Under Title 42 USC 1985: When two or more persons act under color of law to deprive a Citizen of his U.S. constitutional rights…causing… Title 42 USC 1983, injury of a Citizen’s constitutional rights, under Notes 319 and 337 policy and custom, and notes 333, 349, 350,351,352 and 355,…causing violation of 5th and 14th amendment due process and equal protection under the law, there is:
    Title 18 USC 242: felony deprivation of a Citizen’s rights under color of law, in perjury of oaths, by whomever authorized or attempts to enforce the illegal acts, but to stop them by making them personally and severally liable to prosecution for their crimes, you must give them actual notice immediately when they threaten YOU;
    " any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that the testimony, declaration, deposition, or certification by parties subscribed, is true, (1) willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which party does not believe to be true, or (2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1745 of Title 28 USC willfully subscribes as true any material matter which a party does not believe to be true is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years…"
    Title 42 USC 1621..section #118396 note 23; evidence of the same or knowledge is required to convict defendants for conspiring to obstruct justice and commit perjury as would be required to convict party of the substance offence. Ref U.S. v. Bufaline, C.A.N.Y. 1960 285 F.2d 408. See cross ref. Perjury, False Swearing, Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Office, and etc.

    As an example: in the same way as a lifeguard sits in his chair and watches, as a ‘witness’, the child drown, and does not stop or correct the ‘injury’, in that being the ‘witness’ will cause injury or death. The lifeguard in his official capacity can save the child and will be granted immunity from any complaints of that saving, but let that same lifeguard not do his job, be negligent and/or be a witness with the intent of negligence, then you have a Title 42 USCA 1983 injury. Rodney King v. California Highway Patrol.

    Report all threats immediately to your sheriff or police as criminal activity, (see: coercion and threat in the RCW), and don’t be afraid to share your evidence, or file criminal complaints.



This is the Age old equation of Fear, Coercion and Control versus Truth, Love and Freedom, folks. Choose a side and step along.

Read Revelations 21:8. Why are the cowardly, the fearful, at the top of the list of the damned? Because when the chips are down, they cop to the evil program, just to avoid the hassle.

ALL of the terrible problems we are facing as a nation, including the present culmination of the real-time economic overthrow of that skeletal remains of the once proud and free American Republic undigested in the belly of the BEAST, may be laid at the feet of We The People, for failure time and again to simply stand up in sufficient numbers and be counted, (no pun intended), to exercise our God-given natural rights, powers and duties, in peaceable, non-violent resistance, when the cost would not be so great, nor the price so dear.

Here is YOUR chance to make a difference, with low to no personal risk, and a minimum of effort. Join with US in just saying NO to unconstitutional intrusion in our private lives, and in striking a blow for sweet Liberty.

"Let them call me a Rebel; and I welcome it. I feel no concern from it. But I should suffer the misery of demons were I to make a whore of my soul."
Thomas Paine

"Those who make peaceful revolutions impossible will make violent revolutions inevitable."
John F. Kennedy

"The Bill of Rights is a born rebel. It reeks with sedition. In every clause it shakes its fist in the face of constituted authority.... It is the one true guarantee of human freedom to the American people."
Frank I. Cobb