਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

From:                              Rachel Gay Rosser [saverosserhome@yahoo.com]

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Sent:                               Wednesday, April 30, 2014 6:57 AM

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

To:                                   Hill, Elizabeth

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Cc:                                   peter ray; Truman O'Brien; John (Jack) R. Venrick; Calderwood,਍ഀ Amy; Starbard, John; Ortiz, Cathy

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Subject:                          Re: VPD Water tanks

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Good Morning Elizabeth,

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

It is good to hear that਍ഀ a large part of the KC Ombudsman investigation is completed and has written਍ഀ results.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Two questions: 1) may we਍ഀ have a copy of what has been accomplished to review to be better informed @ a਍ഀ future meeting? , 2) "a large part" is an implication that there are਍ഀ yet factors that have not been investigated, what are these topics and when਍ഀ does KC expect to remedy and rectify them? .

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

We are happy to schedule਍ഀ a meeting after we have some information to review so that we may best be਍ഀ informed and expedite resolution.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Thank you,

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Margaret and Gay Rosser

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Friends and Neighbors of

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

saverosserhome@yahoo 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

On Friday, April 25, 2014 11:47 AM, "Hill, Elizabeth"਍ഀ <Elizabeth.Hill@kingcounty.gov>਍ഀ wrote:

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Gay:

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

We have completed a large part of our investigation into your਍ഀ allegations regarding DPER’s enforcement of the County’s development਍ഀ regulations on the Vashon Park District Project.   I would like to਍ഀ schedule a time with you to come out and review the written results of our਍ഀ investigation with you next week.  

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Can you please send me some times and days that would work for਍ഀ you?    In the meantime I will find out where the County office਍ഀ is now located on Vashon since I know it has recently moved closer to town. ਍ഀ Perhaps we can meet there.  I will check.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Thank you Gay.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Elizabeth Hill

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Senior Deputy Ombudsman for Rural and Unincorporated Area Affairs

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

King County Ombudsman’s Office

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

516 Third Avenue, Room W1039

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Seattle, Wa.  98104-2317

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

206-477-1058

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

This email is a public record and may be subject to public਍ഀ disclosure

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

From: Rachel Gay Rosser [mailto:saverosserhome@yahoo.com]਍ഀ
਍ഀ Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 4:34 PM
਍ഀ To: Hill, Elizabeth; Calderwood, Amy; Starbard, John; Ortiz, Cathy
਍ഀ Cc: peter ray; Truman O'Brien; John (Jack) R. Venrick
਍ഀ Subject: VPD Water tanks

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Elizabeth,

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Yes, the tanks were moved but not the 50 feet as KCC states in a਍ഀ rural residential area found in recreational/cultural KCC 21A.  

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

The question that was asked over a month ago and yet to be਍ഀ answered is; "why is KC DPER allowing the use of a code that is for tank਍ഀ setbacks located in industrial/commercial rural area and not the codes that਍ഀ apply to recreational / cultural rural residential areas of 50 feet?  

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Why is KC DPER allowing a Tank Farm Utility Facility to be located਍ഀ on a public play field?  

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

A complaint was filed with KC DDES reference # 437, filed਍ഀ 03/02/2011, 9:29AM, Clearing and Grading without permits, "Fence and਍ഀ property markers…torn out…"  The destruction to our property and this਍ഀ complaint has not been responded to yet.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Various Agencies within KC have been advised of the destruction to਍ഀ private property during a KC permitted project.   

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

KC Ombudsman & DPER has been advised of noncompliance to WAC,਍ഀ KCC and RCW in the removal of survey markers and WM Section monuments.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

KC Ombudsman & DPER has been advised of installations without਍ഀ permit.  Numerous setbacks are in noncompliance, stadium lights, electric poles,਍ഀ bleachers, dugouts backstops.  These actions and installations by VPD are਍ഀ in blatant noncompliance to KCC, WAC and RCW of WA State.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

VPD has admitted to not having secured the legal steps required by਍ഀ Law and Regulation to usurp private property into the VPD Fields project or use਍ഀ as inclusions of setback footage.  VPD has admitted that, "no papers਍ഀ exist," that legally alter, move or change the previously existing lot਍ഀ lines and borderlines & VPD acted without securing documents as Law and਍ഀ Regulation requires.  Forestry permits were not secured, water rights were਍ഀ not secured. This is wrongful exercise by a lawful authority.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

How much of an investigation does it take when the perpetrators,਍ഀ VPD, have admitted to malfeasance that is negatively impacting private citizens਍ഀ for KC to uphold and enforce VPD compliance to law and regulation?

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

  

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

How much investigation does it take when VPD admits to਍ഀ misrepresenting documents, surveys and statutory property jurisdiction to਍ഀ determine that elements of the project are flawed and in need of correction਍ഀ prior to signing off and allowing the park fields to be dedicated & opened਍ഀ for public use? 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

A code is a code, we can detect no ambiguity in this section of਍ഀ law and regulation that would require such an extensive period of time to਍ഀ expire, since March 2011, prior to requesting VPD to adhere.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

We are not asking that the fields be shut down forever, ONLY that਍ഀ KC require KCC, WAC and RCW as is directed and required to be adhered, brought਍ഀ into compliance and the damages that have been inflicted upon abutting property਍ഀ owners be remedied and rectified.  When can we expect a definitive answer਍ഀ on these matters?

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Thank you.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Margaret and Gay Rosser

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

Neighbors and Friends of

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

saverosserhome@yahoo.com

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ

 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ
਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ