FreedomForAllSeasons Research Summary (Table Below)

 

1878 state of Washington Constitution wording regarding Statehood Process

Schedule, Section 19.
"This constitution, when enrolled and signed, shall be deposited by the president of this convention, in the office of the governor of this territory, and in the event of its adoption by the people, the governor shall send a copy thereof to the president of the United States, with the request that he submit the same to congress, together with our request that the state of Washington be admitted into the union. There shall be sent, at the same time, a copy of the act of the legislative assembly of this territory, entitled "An Act to provide for calling a convention to frame a constitution for the state of Washington", and submitting the same to the people for ratification or rejection, approved November ninth eighteen hundred and seventy seven, and also a certified abstract of the votes cast for and against this constitution."

US Statehood Process

Revalent History Regarding Statehood Process

Absolute Rights Definition

"The assumption that, by a certain paper, called the constitution of the United States; a paper (I repeat and reiterate) which nobody ever signed, which but few persons ever read, and which the great body of the people never saw; and also by some forty subsidiary papers, called State constitutions, which also nobody ever signed, which but few persons ever read, and which the great body of the people never saw; all making a perfect system of the merest nothingness;the assumption, I say, that, by these papers, the people have all consented to the abolition of justice itself, the highest moral law of the Universe; and that all their own natural, inherent, inalienable rights to the benefits of that law, shall be annulled; and that they themselves, and everything that is theirs, shall be given over into the irresponsible custody of some forty little cabals of blockheads and villains called lawmakers;blockheads, who imagine themselves wiser than justice itself, and villains, who care nothing for either wisdom or justice, but only for the [*93] gratification of their own avarice and ambitions; and that these cabals shall be invested with the right to dispose of the property, liberty, and lives of all the rest of the people, at their pleasure
or discretion;..."

“Letter To Grover Cleveland” by Lysander Spooner (1886)

 

Icegerg of Freedom

 

"It has been well said, by one of the ablest judges of the age,
that a "constitution is not to receive a technical construction,
like a common law instrument or a stature. It is to be
interpreted so as to carry out the great principles of the
government, not to defeat them." Per Gibson, C.J. in
Commonwealth v. Clark, 7 Watts & S. (Pa.), 133. Butler V.
Com. of Pennsylvania, 51 U.S. 402 (1850)

"The very highest duty of the States, when they entered into
the Union under the Constitution, was to protect all persons
within their boundaries in the enjoyment of these "unalienable
rights with which they were endowed by their Creator.", U.S.
v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

 

WA CON Word Count Compare

 

"Criminals are a small minority in any age or community. And the harm they have done to mankind is infinitesimal when compared to the horrors – the bloodshed, the wars, the persecution, the famines, the enslavements, the wholesale destruction – perpetrated by mankind’s governments. Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights - When unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is men’s deadliest enemy." Ayn Rand

 

"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak, and that it is doing God's service when it is violating all his laws."
John Adams
De Facto:
1. Exercising power AS IF legally constituted
2. Existing in fact; having effect even though
not formally or legally recognized
3. Illegitimate but in effect
4. #2 & 3 Blacks Law Dictionary 7th Edition
Color of Law:
1. An outward often deceptive show
2. A legal claim to or appearance of a right, authority, or office
3. A pretense offered as justification
4. An appearance of authenticity
Colorable:
1. Seemingly valid or genuine
2. Intended to deceive

De facto government:
1. A government that has taken over the regular government
and exercises sovereignty over a nation

2. An independent government established and exercised by a
group of a country's inhabitants who have separated themselves
from the parent state.

Black's Law Dictionary 7th Edition

ultra vires - legal definition

Ultra vires is a Latin term meaning "beyond powers". The term is usually used to refer to acts taken by a corporation or officers of a corporation that are taken outside of the powers or authority granted to them by law or under the corporate charter. Some states have enacted laws to prevent the use of the defense of ultra vires action to unfairly avoid obligations under otherwise valid contracts.

The concept of acting "under color of law" means acts are done while a person acts or purports to act in the performance of official duties under any state, county, or municipal law, ordinance, or regulation. This is a similar concept that refers to the apparently authorized status of the action, as distinguished from the unauthorized status of their actions, which ultra vires refers to.

Specious -
1. apparently good or right but lacking real merit; not
genuine. 2. pleasing to the eye but deceptive.
Random House Dictionary College Edition

 

The Constitution, as currently interpreted, now resembles what
the Founding Lawyers truly desired in their aristocratic heart
of hearts. Two centuries of history have lifted the veil from
that picture of Dorian Gray, leaving us with the Hag of
Hegemony -Kenneth W. Royce (Hologram of Liberty)

Hologram of Liberty Book Review

ABOUT HOLOGRAM OF LIBERTY

Civic Belief #1: The Congress was given few specific powers. All else
was left to the States and to the people under the 10th Amendment.
Ample checks and balances protect the Republic from federal tyranny.

Civic Belief #2: The Federal Government has become so powerful only
because despotic officials have overstepped their strict, constitutional
bounds.

If #1 is true, then how did #2 happen?

"The Constitution has either authorized such a government
as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it".
Lysander Spooner, No Treason (1870)

Think about that. By either the Constitution's purposeful design or by
its unintentional weakness, we suffer under a federal colossus which
takes a third of our lives and regulates everything from alfalfa to
xylophones. This is Freedom? So, why aren't Americans free? Perhaps
we weren't really meant to be!

hol· o· gram (häl' e gram) n. [Gr. holos, whole + gramma,
writing]
2. a document falsely representing itself as an accurate
metaphor

lib· er· ty (lib'er tee) n. [ L. liber, free]

"For over 200 years, we've been in blind love with an
apparition, a hologram of liberty." Now that the blinders are
off, I plan to keep the book readily at hand on the bookshelf in
my office as a reference. I suspect it will prove almost as
valuable the second and the twenty-second time around."
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/03/31/ladylib.htm

Weapons of Mass Destruction Found, Part 1-
(Must Understand)
Weapons of Mass Destruction Found, Part 2 -
The Constitution Con (Must Understand)
Holodeck Law

 

"A MYTH is a LIE


But Myths are propagated by those who have a DUTY to know the
TRUTH But choose to LIE to deceive those they have a Duty to.

Told often enough by those in positions of trust to those who do not
have a duty to know better, the Myth begins to take on the color, or
appearance, of Truth.

This is a list (see below) of the MYTHS commonly utilized by
Attorneys to deceive their clients and by those the public has trusted to
SERVE as an Official in OUR Courts, to deceive the public, in
violation of their fiduciary duty."

Source material: http://www.informed.org/MYTHS.htm

"Judges have been given the "power to interpret" the law.
Ours is an "adversary system" of justice. Ours is a "common law"
based system of jurisprudence.  The STATE is the sovereign, is
immune from [law]suit or liability, Officials (public servants) are
Immune is the BIGGEST MYTH OF ALL."

Link here to read the hard truth about above statement and more -

http://www.informed.org/MYTHS.htm

 

State of Washington 1889 Illegitimate Constitution

State of Washington 1889 more Illegitimate Constitution

 

A Constitutional Journey From Freedom To Enslavement

Table of Contents
I. Introduction - Abstracts And Primer
II. A Constitutional Journey - Mapping History to the NW American States
III. Fundamental Constitutional Requirements
IV. State of Washington ConstitutionS Key Sections Comparison
V. State of Washington ConstitutionS Key Words Comparison
VI. State of Washington Original "More Legitimate" 1878 "Constitution"
VII. State of Washington Illegitimate 1889 "Constitution"
VIII. The Enabling Act
IX. State of Washington "ConstitutionS" Chronology
X. Your State's Relative Enslavement Index
XI. Directly Related Material
XII. Connecting Material
XIII. Conclusion
XIV. Labor, Property, Taxes, Constitutions And The Natural Born state Citizen
XV. Consolidated Annual Financial Reports - The Massive Wealth of the States
XVI. Common Sense Revisited
XVII. Son of the Republic Look and Learn
XVIII. Key Material To Send To Nearest Copy Center To Print, Study, Handout

 

I. Introduction - Abstracts and Primer

 

Web Site Documentary Abstract - Short Version:

The highest charters and actions of the land, e.g. the Laws of
Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution have been laundered into a vast hierarchy of illegitimate municipal corporations using corrupted constitutions written by "powerful" political and legal elite's, who were NOT given such authority nor jurisdiction by the common people. "They exceeded their power by very far". They did not draft true and honest constitutional republics.

Closed door secret sessions with agendas framed up property taking articles by intentionally leaving out and/or scrubbing out, property protecting rights for which there was no authority or jurisdiction given by the people, or the highest charters and action of the nation.

The vast majority of the state natural born Citizenship have been duped. The drafters and their "delegates" were "soiled"
with political agenda, historical ignorance plus illegitimate power and uncontrollable greed.

 

New state Citizens were duped.

Duped - 1. a person who is easily deceived or fooled; gull. 2. a person
who unquestioningly or unwittingly serves a cause or another person: a
dupe of the communists. 3. to make a dupe of; deceive; delude; trick.

The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, College Edition

 

Web Site Documentary Abstract - Long Version

Neither State of Washington "Constitutions", 1878 or 1889, or
the current 2010 version of the 1889 Constitution amended near
100 times, meet the hard and honest standards of a true and
honest Constitutional Republic. The union of the states and the
states were mandated to conform strictly to a Constitutional
Republic standard. This never happened.

The 1889 more illegitimate and complete rewrite of the original 1878, more legitimate State of Washington Constitution, scrubbed out significant key provisions regarding individual rights.

Constitutions of the several states including their union of the
states, CANNOT be framed using the very tyranny the highest
charters and actions of the land condemned, i.e.

  • the Laws of Nature and Nature's God,
  • the Declaration of Independence,
  • the spirit and success of the American Revolution and
  • the Christian heritage of the American people

Current state constitutions are framed more as a combination of municipal corporation by-laws and constitutional gulags which
became the root for all evil and takings through the revised codes
of each state.

This will become self evident as you read this material and
connect all the constitutional dots of taking. You and your family,
your property, your unalienable rights and your traditions were
clearly brokered away by soiled territorial and ensuing state
governors, THEIR "delegates", THEIR "constitutions" and
THEIR municipal corporations.

 

Short Abstract

This is a primer on crony constitutional conventions and how
the original several states AND the following new states cooked
their constitutional books and ultimately the revised codes, and
installed a feudal and tyrannical network of British originated
municipal corporations, progressive law and codes far worse
than the colonial hated British Common Law. Thereafter, they
subverted and ignored their own higher court rulings and
decimated the separation of branches and powers.

All this corruption has lead to an exponential rise into the
current police state.  There was never a true and honest
separation of power in the new union, nor its territories nor the
ensuing states. The political and legal elite aggressively
centralized, occupied and controlled all the branches and
increasingly integrated themselves within all levels of this new
government through a wide and growing network of beneficial
professional and public associations including municipal
corporations.  

The collateral aftermath of corrupted constitutional
convention cronyism and THEIR resulting "constitutions",
created  waves of increased takings of property which
ultimately destabilized and collapsed the true and honest
original intent of the highest charters and actions of this new
experiment in individual freedom and liberty in America. 

 

"Be ever mindful, throughout the twenty-four hours of the day,
to apply yourselves to the study of the Unthinkable."
Daito Kokushi

 

State of Washingotn 1878 Constitution

State of Washington 1878 More Legitimate Constitution

There were only 21 pages in the "more legitimate"
1878 Constitution vs. 111 pages in the 1889
complete rewrite "more illegitimate" version.
Constitutions are written to serve the natural
born not enslave them, but this never happened.

Constitutions cannot be orchestrated, delegated,
written, rewritten or amended to go against the
natural born state Citizens unalienable rights who
are the true and honest settlers and creators of the
states.

Nor can these charters go against the highest
laws of the land, i.e. The Laws of Nature and
Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence
and the success and intent of the American
Revolution.

 

"The Constitution is not an instrument or the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."
Patrick Henry

 

II. A Constitutional Journey - Mapping History to the NW American States

 

1783 Paris Peace Treaty

"Prior to the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which signified the end of the
Revolutionary War, land in the rebelling States was owned
in part by the King of England. The King granted rights and
privileges related to these lands in the rebelling States following the
historic British pattern.

However within the Treaty of Paris the King gave up his sovereign
ownership of the land
. In this way most lands in the States became
the property of sovereign individuals (not governments) without
any State rights to taxation. People dwelling in the US have
unlimited right to contract, many freeholders exercised that right
by exchanging municipalities the right to taxation in exchange for
benefits from sharing resources with their neighbors.

This practice was adopted in large scale during the Great
Depression as counties DECEPTIVELY began to bill allodial
landowners taxes and offered services in exchange for payment
without giving notice that such payment might imply transfer of
allodial owner from the individual to the State.

Deceit is a form of Fraud and thus this deceptive practice did not
in fact transfer allodial title, thus today, as in Noah Webster's day,
in the United States, most lands are allodial as denoted by the
words "fee simple" or (FREE OF FEE)
.

http://www.ezgeography.com/encyclopedia/Allodium

"The Constitution does not extend and authorize what the
Declaration of Independence condemned" -
Inferred from "Treaties and the Constitution" (Link below)

 

British Discovery Ship NA Mapping

1798 British Ship Discovery maps western coast of NW America

 

Map of US in 1783

1783 Map of United States Territories and the "Several States"

Treaty of Peace Signed September 3, 1783 between United States
of America and his Britannic Majesty
Our country and the British Crown signed the Treaty of Peace on
September 3, 1783 (8 Stat. 218), the first provision of which reads
as follows:

    "His Britannic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz,
    New-Hampshire, Massachusetts-Bay, Rhode-Island and
    Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey,
    Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North-Carolina,
    South-Carolina, and Georgia, to  be free, sovereign and
    independent States; that he treats with them as such; and for
    himself, his heirs and successors, relinquishes all claims to the
    government, proprietary and  territorial rights of the same, and
    every part thereof."

    Great article by Larry Becraft: http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/WeAintBrits.htm

 

 

Map of US Territories 1803-1804

1803 - 1804 map for The Louisiana Purchase detail
(Click on map to read fascinating history of brinksmenship of Louisiana Purchase)

"The inhabitants of the ceded territory shall be incorporated in the Union of the United States and admitted as soon as possible according to the principles of the federal Constitution to the enjoyment of all these rights, advantages and immunities of citizens of the United States, and in the mean time they shall be maintained and protected in the free enjoyment of their liberty, property and the Religion which they profess."

 

NW Territory

1818 Joint British & United States Control of NW America & Western Canada

 

1846 Oregon Treaty Establishes 49th Parallel

Washington Hood. "Map of the United States Territory of Oregon West of the Rocky Mountains. Exhibiting the various Trading Depots or Forts occupied by the British Hudson Bay Company connected with the Western and northwestern Fur Trade." Washington. 16 3/4 x 20 1/8. Drawn by M. H. Stansbury. Lithograph by W.J. Stone. Folding map issued with Caleb Cushing's Territory of Oregon [Supplemental Report]. (25th Congress, 3d Session, HD 101). February 16, 1839. Octavo. 61 pages, partially uncut. Very good condition. Graff: 4381; Wheat, Transmississippi: 434.

A report and map concerning the Oregon border dispute between Britain and the United States. In 1818, the two countries had established joint control over a large Oregon Territory, encompassing the lands west of the Rocky Mountains. Though joint control worked for a time, American influence faded as Britain strengthened control through a series of Hudson's Bay Company bases. In 1838, Senator Lewis Linn issued a report to Congress urging the United States to occupy and take control of the southern part of this region. This report was accompanied by a detailed map of the entire region based on Arrowsmith's 1834 map of British North America, but updated with relevant information. In addition the map was used to illustrate the Supplemental Report, Feb. 16, 1839. Mr. Cushing from the Committee of Foreign Affairs . . . in relation to the territory beyond the Rocky Mountains and in a later report on Military posts in the west. Linn said of this map that it was "believed to be the most correct, and furnishes the most recent and authentic information of any yet published."

Two borders are shown for what Linn wanted as an American Oregon Territory, the southern with Mexico at the 42nd parallel and a northern border at the 49th parallel. The British saw things differently, and this dispute grew fairly tense. With the opening of the Oregon Trail in 1843, Americans started moving into the region in great numbers and many laid claim to the entire region, including James Polk, who ran for President in 1844 with the slogan "Fifty-four Forty or Fight!" The dispute was finally settled by the Oregon Treaty of 1846, establishing the 49th parallel as the border. This edition of the map was used earlier in the debate, in 1842, to accompany another Congressional report on the establishment of forts between Council Bluffs and the Pacific Ocean. Mexico's Upper California is shown at the bottom, with a very square Great Salt Lake having an American Fur Company depot on its eastern shore, and British Territory is shown in the north, with its many forts. Also shown are American forts south of the 49th degree line. Throughout the controversy over Oregon, this map provided Congressmen and other Americans with the best mapping of the time, a historic significance that makes this one of the most desirable maps of the region. $825 http://www.philaprintshop.com/oregon.html

American NW territories boundary dispute history

 

Lewis & Clark Expedition

1804 - 1806 Lewis & Clark Expedition to NW America

 

Oregon California Utah Territories

1850 Oregon & Utah & New Mexico Territories

 

 

How Washington Territory was cut out of Oregon Territory

NW Territories

1856 Territories of Washington, Oregon, Utah & New Mexico

 

Territories of NW Idaho Montana

 

1868 Territories of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Dakota

State
Settled
Entered Union
33. Oregon 1811 Feb. 14, 1859
38. Colorado 1858 Aug. 1, 1876
39. North Dakota 1812 Nov. 2, 1889
40. South Dakota 1859 Nov. 2, 1889
41. Montana 1809 Nov. 8, 1889
42. Washington 1811 Nov. 11, 1889
43. Idaho 1842 July 3, 1890
44. Wyoming 1834 July 10, 1890

Data Source

III. Fundamental Constitutional Requirements

"The Constitution is not an instrument for
the government to restrain the people, it is
an instrument for the people to restrain the
government."

Patrick Henry

 

§ 6. The constitutions of the American states are grants of
power to those charged with the government, but NOT grants of
freedom to the people. They define and guaranty private rights,
but do not create them.

HANDBOOK of AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

by Henry Campbell Black, LL. D. Fourth Edition; West Publishing Company. 1927
THE CONSTITUTION IN TIME OF WAR.

 

"The state constitutions in this country grant and limit the powers of the
several departments of government, but, generally speaking, they are not to
be considered as the origin of liberty or rights. [ Ex parte Quarg, 149 Cal.
79, 84 P. 766, 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 183, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 9 Ann. Cas. 747;
People v. Warden of City Prison, 154 App. Div. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 29
N.Y.Cr. R. 66.] But with more particular reference to the rights called
natural, it must now be remarked that they exist before constitutions and
independently of them
. Constitutions enumerate such rights and provide
against their deprivation or infringement, but do not create them.
It is
supposed that all power, all rights, and all authority are vested in the people
before they form or adopt a constitution. By such an instrument, they create
a government, and define and limit the powers which its agencies are to
exercise, and they also specify the rights which the constitution is to secure
and the government respect. But they do not thereby invest the citizens of
the commonwealth with any natural rights which they did not before
possess.
This is shown by the provision found in the constitutions of many
of the states that the enumeration, in the Bill of Rights, of particular rights
or privileges shall not be construed to impair or derogate from others
retained by the people."

Constitutions

 

"Sovereign individuals are subject only to a Common Law, whose
primary purposes are to protect and defend individual rights, and to
prevent anyone, whether public official or private person, from
violating the rights of other individuals. Within this scene, Sovereigns
are never subject to their own creations, and the constitutional contract
is such a creation."
To quote the Supreme Court, "No fiction can make
a natural born subject."
Milvaine v. Coxe's Lessee, 8 U.S. 598 (1808).
That is to say, no fiction, be it a corporation, a statute law, or an
administrative regulation, can mutate a natural born Sovereign into
someone who is subject to his own creations. "

http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/htm/chaptr11.htm , page 8 of 20

 

Constitution for the United States of America

Article. IV. Section. 3.

New States MAY be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no
new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other
State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or
Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States
concerned as well as of the Congress.

 

CONSTITUTION, government. The fundamental law of the state, containing the
principles upon which the government is founded, and regulating the divisions
of the sovereign powers, directing to what persons each of these powers is to be
confided, and the, manner it is to be exercised as, the Constitution of the United
States.

The words constitution and government are sometimes employed to express the
same idea, the manner in which sovereignty is exercised in each state.
Constitution is also the name of the instrument containing the fundamental laws
of the state.

By constitution, the civilians, and, from them, the common law writers, mean
some particular law; as the constitutions of the emperors contained in the Code.

John Bouvier A Law Dictionary 6th Edition 1856

"As noted above by the famous John Bouvier, a Constitution's essential element
is that it is, "…containing the principles upon which the government is founded,
and regulating the divisions of the sovereign powers…

" You will note that in Bouvier's definition, nothing appears about regulating
Citizens
. That is because, at least in a free nation, it is The People, in agreement
with each other, who create the Constitution for the sole purpose of
establishing, defining, and limiting the scope of government.
"

Constitutions

 

A Constitutional Republic is a state where the officials are elected as
representatives of the people, and MUST GOVERN according to existing
constitutional law that limits the government's power over citizens.

A Constitutional Republic is the current form of government in the United
States. However in recent years, many people have criticized the federal
government for moving away from a Constitutional Republic, as defined
by the Constitution, and towards a pure democracy.

TeamLaw.org defines a Constitutional Republic as follows:

A Republic, by definition, has two principle elements. First, it is
controlled by Law; therefore, it does not control Law. Second,
it recognizes the private independent sovereign nature of each
person (man or woman) of competent age and capacity;
therefore, a Republic must be representative in its nature.

A Republic recognizes Law is unchangeable, or at least that it
can only be changed by a higher source than government
. In a
Republic the concept of “collective sovereignty” cannot exist,
except with recognition that the State or nation, as a body of
sovereigns, can speak through one elected voice; though that
one voice can never lawfully interfere with the private rights of
the individual sovereigns.
“A Constitutional Republic” is a government created and
controlled, at least, by the Law of a Constitution. The
Constitution of the United States of America was, in Law, a
foundation based on the Bible, the Magna Charta and the
Declaration of Independence. Those documents recognize
man’s sovereignty, the divine nature of man’s creation and
man’s divine right to Life, Liberty, the means of acquiring and
possessing Property, and the pursuit of happiness.

 

 

Republic vs. Democracy

Table data from http://www.supremelaw.org

Constitution That Never Was (Web site material regarding above table

Jacks' comments: American's live in a Constitutional Republic NOT a
democracy, huge difference. In a democracy, the citizens are slaves of the
elites who control the cites, counties, state and the Mother of all municipal
corporations, District of Columbia, USA Inc.

In a true and honest (self-evident) Constitutional Republic, the
constitutions of each state and the union of the states must be strictly
framed to the highest standards of a Constitutional Republic wherein each
INDIVIDUAL natural born state Citizen is given absolute free choice as a
King or Queen and a Son and Daughter of the land.

The use of "majorities" and "minorities" through a representative limited
Constitutional Republic apply primarily to commerce between the states,
issues with foreign governments, and protecting the independence of the
states NOT to the individual rights, liberty, freedom and private property
of the sons and daughters of the land. True and honest charters of free
nations strictly limit government, NOT the natural born state Citizens
who are born free and sovereign protected by Laws of Nature
and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the success and
intent of the first American Revolution.

Tyranny of government was clearly condemned in the Declaration of
Independence and the action of rebellion and success of the American
Revolution. The natural born fought and died to free themselves from
ALL forms of tyranny, taxing and taking of property and their traditions.

Constitutions of the land have NOT been honestly framed to protect all
these unalienable rights.
They have in fact been better framed to take
everything versus protecting them.

Democracy now in America, is the twin sister of Communism, check it out

"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of
the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine."

Thomas Jefferson

"The American people had fought and won the War for Independence in
order to escape from the corrupt English court system. But in less that ten
years, the same antiquated system was forced upon them."

"The Constitution That Never Was" Ralph Boryszewski, Page 11

 

"These new Constitutions are not "constitutions" in the true sense. A true Constitution
creates a government of, by, and for, The People; The People being the de jure Citizens
of that society/community/nation. These new Constitutions are actually nothing more
than "statutory laws" that are dressed up as Constitutions and referred to as such. The
original Constitutions of states admitted to the Union before the Civil War (1861-1865)
are based on the fundamental beliefs and concepts espoused in the Declaration of
Independence. State constitutions drafted after the Civil War must be studied with a
careful eye."

Constitutions

"In America, we now have three forms of Constitutions in operation. The first is the
original [de-jure] Constitution of a state. Unless one initiates a court action that relies
upon a provision of an original Constitution, the states now function exclusively upon
the second form of Constitution - the new state Constitutions for federal citizens. The
third form is the federal Constitution."

Constitutions

"Because the states no longer actively function on their original Constitutions, they
only amend the newer ones. In accordance with the limited protections of federal
citizens, amendments to these newer Constitutions can address virtually any issue and
can impose restrictions and limitations that are not enforceable upon de jure state
Citizens."

Constitutions

 

Please link here for a beautiful write up of this great man

Jack's comments:

To better understand how constitutions are manipulated & used against the natural born
state Citizens vs. protecting us, please scan or read the following four Spooner classic
works or print them out via your nearest copy center and read on the fly. This will alter
your perspective of constitutions forever and well worth your time.

You have to ask yourself, why would an ex PA in Cook County Attorney's Office and
now Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory teaching constitutional law, go to so
much trouble erecting a physical and web site monument to this outspoken legal genius,
who died in obsurity.

And the answer is, Lysander Spooner was prophetic and far ahead of his time and ours.
No one in his day and few in our day, could comprehend the weight of the hard truth, he
wrote. He is "A Lawyer For All Seasons", whose spirit is still alive in the truth he left
behind 149 years ago, for those with open minds and hearts to see.

No Treason, No. 6 Lysander Spooner - The Constitution of No Authority
Randy E. Barnett uploaded this work in process over years as a tribute to Lysander
Spooner. Mr. Barnett is the Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory at the
Georgetown University Law Center, where he teaches constitutional law and contracts.
He has also taught torts, criminal law, evidence, agency and partnership, and
jurisprudence. After graduating from Northwestern University and Harvard Law School,
he tried many felony cases as a prosecutor in the Cook County States’ Attorney’s Office
in Chicago. He has been a visiting professor at Northwestern and Harvard Law School.
In 2008, he was awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship in Constitutional Studies.

 

A Treatise on the Corruption of The US Constitutional Convention Abstract

Above One Paragraph Abstract

"Those who framed the U.S. Constitution were accused of exceeding their power by very far."
This is a key piece of the puzzle to fully comprehend.
A handful of very prominent men rammed
through an idea to centralize control of 13 independent republics and commonwealths and their
territories thereof, using the collateral fear from nearly loosing the American Revolution. They
used violence, secret meetings, back room deals, voting fraud, predetermined agenda tactics, big
city power politics, without full authority of their applicable state legislatures & the natural born
citizens therein. All while stampeding the people away from a very simple original idea of a single
purpose government limited to
the regulation of trade ONLY funded with a 5% tax on imposts
into a central all powerful government, i.e. our current form of a  "Constitutional Republic
by tyranny.

This is NOT the way it was suppose to be, NOR is it too late to change.

 

IV. State of Washington ConstitutionS Key Sections Comparison

 

"The Constitution is not an
instrument for the government
to restrain the people, it is an
instrument for the people to
restrain the government."

-- Patrick Henry

§ 6. The constitutions of the American states
are grants of power to those charged with the
government, but not grants of freedom to the
people. They define and guaranty private
rights, but do not create them.

HANDBOOK of AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW

by Henry Campbell Black, LL. D. Fourth Edition;
West Publishing Company. 1927 THE
CONSTITUTION IN TIME OF WAR.

 

"The state constitutions in this country grant and limit the powers of the
several departments of government, but, generally speaking, they are not to be
considered as the origin of liberty or rights
. [Ex parte Quarg, 149 Cal. 79, 84 P.
766, 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 183, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 9 Ann. Cas. 747; People v.
Warden of City Prison, 154 App. Div. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 29 N.Y.Cr. R. 66.]
But with more particular reference to the rights called natural, it must now be
remarked that they exist before constitutions and independently of them.
Constitutions enumerate such rights and provide against their deprivation or
infringement, but do not create them. It is supposed that all power, all rights,
and all authority are vested in the people before they form or adopt a
constitution."

Constitutions

 

Key Constitutional Comparison Takings Tables - 1878 v. 1889 v. 2010

 

V. State of Washington ConstitutionS Word Count & Key Word Comparison

 

WA State CON Word Count Compare

 

State of Washington Word Compare

Click on Table above to view full size

You can see at a glance, in the above table, the massive trend of takings using a key word search. Blue shade indicates rights oriented, red is municipal corporation oriented. Study the
context of the words in the above Compare Table Report Links and decide for yourself.

Note key word counts such as " land, property, rights, militia", are higher in the 1889 and current Constitution due in part because of amending. The amending was often done multiple times and the text changes, additions or deletions was not highlighted so it is intentionally difficult to see the changes.

The word "property" was amended in 8 sections of the current 2010 version of the 1889 Constitutions 21 times.

In reality we have less to none of these rights. The basic founding and fundamental meanings of absoute protection of all our unalienable rights is so far gone to make"constitutions" mere municipal corporation bylaws more designed for seizure of our birth rights than protection
of the same.

 

VI. State of Washington Original "More Legitimate" 1878 Constitution

Extracts of some key Sections taken out or changed

in the 1889 Illegitimate "Constitution"

State of Washinton Legitimate Constituiton 1878

 

State of Washington Original 1878 "More Legitimate" Constitution
Washington State 1878 Constitution - digital version of original handwrite

 

 

Article II Eminent Domain
Section 3. State of Washington Original 1878 Constitution

Section 3. is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"The people of the state, in their right of sovereignty, are declared to possess the ultimate property in and to all lands within the jurisdiction of the state, and all lands, the title to which shall fail from a defect of heirs, shall revert or escheat to the state. "

Jack's comments: Eminent domain replaced the Law of Mortmain of England. Eminent domain destroys your allodial rights and goes against the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the success
and intent of the American Revolution. This is one of many conflicts written into the US and state constitutions for profit and power going against the higher laws of the land.

Article V of the U.S. Constitution Bill of Rights "nor shall property be taken for public use without just compensation" does NOT infer private property will be taken by force NOR
does it infer private property can be taken.

Once again, we have been duped.

 

Article III Distribution of Powers
Section 2. State of Washington Original 1878 Constitution

Section 2. is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"No person or collection of persons, holding any position in or exercising any authority under one of these departments, shall hold any office in, or exercise any authority whatever under either of the others, except such as may be express provided in this constitution."

The position of State Attorney General is also rightfully MISSING in the 1878 Original 1878 constitution but mentioned 9 times in the 1889 version.
Relevant read re. missing 13th Amendment in US Constitution (Item #11)

The original 13th Amendment is missing in the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1819, restricts nobility.

    • If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince,
      or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them"  Journal of The Senate, Page 508

EMOLUMENT. The lawful gain or profit which arises from an office.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition

"Those who have been once intoxicated with power and have derived any kind of emolument from it can never willingly abandon it." ~ Edmund Burke

"The term "Attorney General" was NOT mentioned in the U.S. Constitution or ratifying conventions nor does it appear in the text of the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, Congress did not have the authority to create a new officer, an Attorney General, whom it could constitutionally involve in either the judicial or executive process; NOR did congress have the authority to create a new officer to be known as an "attorney for the United States." Congress was limited to establishing the federal courts. According to the terms of the Constitution, the federal courts could only be hearing bodies of judges limited entirely to deciding constitutional questions. The Supreme and inferior courts could not be trial courts if there was no Attorney General to act as attorney for the United States who could submit arguments in rebuttal to those of an aggrieved person seeking a judicial ruling. The word "trial" appears only twice in the Constitution and refers specifically to trial by jury, which "shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed."

"The word "suit" does not once appear in the Constitution."

The Constitution That Never Was by Ralph Boryszewski, pg. 175 (retired 90+ Rochester NY Policeman)

Link here to see how the First Judiciary Act and many other CONgressional takings stole what was rightfully yours after the American Revolution.

 

State of Washington AG waves his hands on property rights

Photo credit to a fellow rural property owner and friend, Ron Ewart www.narlo.org . State of Washington AG Facing Angry State of Washington Property Owners.
Credit to my fellow property rights friend Ron Ewart for the following material. His site is www.narlo.org
2006 AGO Takings Guidance

 

Here is one Classic Example of Abuse of "Distribution of Powers":

Jacks's comments regarding AG "reasoning":

Here is a classic example of misuse of office in a letter (link directly above) authored by the now Governor of the State of Washington, Christine Gregoire, then State AG and Assistant AG Jeffrey Even, responding to a question by a Prosecuting Attorney in Jefferson County regarding allodial titles and property taxes and used by the current State AG Rob McKenna.

The land came to us through great suffering and tragedy of many people. Those sworn by oath and "delegated" to protect us, instantly brokered the territory away for $10 per acre and argued at length about the price. This land is our land and it it was free land, freehold and allodial to all the state natural born Citizens as well as the native tribes, they paid a far worse price.

Four attorneys, (see below) all probably members of the same BAR association working in the same state and a county within that state, agree allodial and land patent title do not stand above property taxes while ignoring high court rulings property taxes are unconstitutional as well as the assessment and appraisal process of private property, to name a few improprieties.

The State AG office and their affiliated county and city political subdivision PA offices appear to be NOT constitutional per the original more legitimate 1878 State Constitution and the US Constitution. It appears, AG and PA offices have no constitutional standing, yet they act as a collection creature and nexus between an artificial creature with no feet or constitutional ground to stand upon while consuming the very real hand it steals from.

  • PLUS the current 1889 State of Washington "Constitution" is NOT legitimate, PLUS the 1878 State of Washington "legitimate" Constitution contains strong land ownership (property rights) language,
  • PLUS at least 3 high state courts & one "high" council have ruled property taxes are unconditional as they are now applied,
  • PLUS government political subdivision municipal corporations and their officers ignore the basic common sense definition of "allodial" given in multiple law dictionaries,
  • PLUS they ignore multiple high court ruling that labor is private property and ALSO cannot be taxed.
  • There are 53 states where a state income tax is illegitimately applied.

"Constitutions" are not unlike any other political created subversive agenda, e.g.

  • "unFederal unReserve Act",
  • 16th, 14th & 17th illegitimate Amendments (never properly ratified) ,
  • United Nations Agenda 21
  • "sustainable development",
  • "man caused global warming",
  • "alternative energy",
  • "Endangered Species Act",
  • "critical areas ordinances",
  • "Growth Management Act",
  • "Shoreline Management Act"
  • Rails To Trails Act, et al.

Many government "charters", "acts", "amendments", "ordinances", et al, are created outside of legitimate de jure laws and written into de facto political codes with a hidden political agenda. Few are wiser.

Over 80% of state and national legislation goes against the highest laws of the land, i.e. the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, Declaration of Independence and the succes and intent of the first American Revolution.

The courts, BAR, Offices of AG, PA's and governor are extremely political and prejudiced, obviously. They have a huge personal stake in the takings of property to keep their careers and benefits. All of these groups directly derive there power from how much property they can take. Thereby, there is NO separation of power in the union NOR the states NOR THEIR county and city municipal corporations, NOR has
there ever been.

Municipal corporations not unlike private corporations bear no cost. They pass it all on and profit from it, in uncountable ways. In private corporations, the choice is "free" to purchase the product or service. In municipal corporations, there is no choice, i.e. they are government monopolies. There are NO high charters or actions of the land allowing any government agency to go into any form of business for any
reason, let alone create a monopoly based on deception and extortion of the natural born state Citizens, for whom they took an oath to protect.

Another example of abuse of distribution of power becomes apparent when you ask why there are so few unanimous decisions in the courts. One may assume diverse opinions is good in law. This is your clue that the courts are political courts, not true and honest courts of law holding firm to the highest founding and fundamental charters, and intentions in our land. Political courts are predominantly divided courts.

Divided courts with their legislative and executive counterparts, aide and abet the manipulation and taking literally everything including your property by not upholding ALL decisions to the Laws of Nature and Nature's God and staying completely clear of the use of tyranny mentioned in the Declaration of Independence and the intentions and success of the American Revolution.

These great charters and actions of our land freed the natural born from indenturement and enslavement gave us allodial title to all our property without obligation to anyone, most especially the state who are charged to protect our free choice at all costs.

 

"Be ever mindful, throughout the twenty-four hours of the day,
to apply yourselves to the study of the Unthinkable."
Daito Kokushi

 

Staking Her Claim

Article V. Declaration of Rights
Section 23. State of Washington Orig. 1878 Constitution

Section 23 is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"All lands within the state are declared to be allodial, and feudal tenures, with
all their incidents, are PROHIBITED.
Liens and grants of agricultural lands for
a longer term than fifteen years, in which rent or services of any kind shall be
reserved, and all fines and like restraints upon alienation reserved in any grant
of land hereafter made, are declared to be void. "

 

Jack's comments: Please note definitions for "allodial" and "feudal" follow.

The reasons for the act of the American Revolution were clearly laid out in the
Declaration of Independence. The American Revolution was to free us
from ALL tyranny. Your land, home, labor, possessions, vehicles and animals
are all private property which are natural rights given to you by birth, as a
natural born state Citizen in America. They are secured from taking by the act
of the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence and the Laws of
Nature and Nature's God. Constitutional conventions and their resulting
"constitutions" CANNOT take or war upon these God given and unalienable
rights.

If we in fact do not have allodial title and the natural born do, in fact, pay taxes
(tribute) on property (land, home, labor, equipment, animal, transportation), then
we do NOT live in a Constitutional Republic. Those charged with protecting us
from these takings, have betrayed us, i.e. committed treason.

The Constitution of the several states was never fully ratified by the 13 states or
the 3 million some colonists at the time of the initial signing. The Bill of Rights
was left out for 2 years and then it was only amended in, as a very limited
straw horse vs. much stronger full articles. The direct tax taking clauses were
never wanted nor were they approved but they were forced in the constitution.

(see references at link below Freedom From Taxes.

The worst fears of the Federalists (pro strong central government) came
true and the concerns of those against the union of the "states" were prophetic. The
fix was in before the original constitutional convention of the several states began.
This same political staging of taking property and everything we rightfully,
completely and absolutely own without allodial rights was illegitimately and
fraudulently written into the State of Washington Constitutions in 1878 and in 1889
and continues illegitimately to this day, 132 years later.

 
The US Constitution That Never Was (Must Check Out To Better Understand)  
Freedom From Taxes (NO Direct or Indirect Taxes on the Natural Born is
Legitimate)
 
Washington State Supreme Court declares
citizen approved state income tax unconstitutional
 

 

Article 5. Declaration of Rights
Section 7. Freedom of Speech - Original 1878 Constitution
"Every person may freely speak write and publish his opinions on all subjects being responsible for the abuse of that liberty; and no laws shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all prosecutions for libel, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury, and if it appears that the matter charged a libelous be true, and was published with good motives and justifiable ends, the party accused shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to
determine the law and the fact."

Article I. Declaration of Rights
Section 5. Freedom of Speech - 2nd 1889 Constitution
"Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right."

Jack's comments:
Notice the right of the jury to determine the law and the fact is gone in the second 1889 Constituton and the much stronger wording of the 1878 original Constitution protecting freedom of speech.

 

ALLODIAL. Free; not holden of any lord or superior; owned without obligation of vassalage or fealty; the opposite of feudal...

ALLODIUM. Land held absolutely in one's own right, and not of any lord or superior; land not subject to feudal duties or burdens. An estate held by absolute ownership, without recognizing any superior to
whom any duty is due on account thereof...

Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4th Edition 2003

allodial ... Free; not held subordinately; opposed to "feudal." In England, all lands are held by the crown, and none are allodial. In the United States, all lands have been allodial since the American Revolution.

allodium ... An allodial estate; an estate not held under a superior.

Ballentine's Law Dictionary 1948

Team Law Open Forum

"So far as we are aware, virtually all of the occupied land in Washington State is secured by Land Patent. Thus, all landowners in Washington are land patent secured landowners, whether they are aware of that and have accepted that fact or not."

ALLODIUM estates. Signifies an absolute estate of inheritance, in contradistinction to a feud.

2. In this country the title to land is essentially allodial, and every tenant in fee simple has an absolute and perfect title, yet in technical language his estate is called an estate in fee simple, and the tenure free and common socage. 3 Kent, Com. 390; Cruise, Prel. Dis. c. 1, 13; 2 Bl. Com. 45. For the etymology of this word, vide 3 Kent Com. 398 note; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1692.

Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition

"All lands within the state are declared to be allodial, and feudal tenures are prohibited. On this point counsel contended, first, that one of the principal elements of feudal tenures was, that the feudatory could not independently alien or dispose of his fee; and secondly,
that the term allodial describes free and absolute ownership, ... independent ownership, in like manner as personal property is held; the entire right and dominion; that it applies to lands held of no superior to whom the owner owes homage or fealty or military service, and describes an estate subservient to the purposes of commerce, and alienable at the will of the owner; the most ample and perfect interest which can be owned in land."

Barker v Dayton 28 Wisconsin 367 (1871)

Allodial: Land ownership that is unfettered, outright and absolute. It is the opposite of the feudal system as it supposes no obligation to another (i.e. a lord).

When the USA broke away from England, the unfettered use and charging of land by the owner was a primary objective.

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/A/Allodial.aspx

Allodial Defined Blacks Law 1910

Blacks Law Dictionary 2nd Edition 1910

More Enlightenment on YOUR Allodial Rights

Jack's comments:

Wherein do you find allodial ownership subordinates the Natural Born
American Citizen to any color of law or de facto taking subject to force or involuntary adhesion, . e.g. taxes, regulation, permits, zoning, variances, easements, minerals, restrictions of any kind, eminent domain, water, liens, noxious weeds, right of ways, improvements, buffers, ordinances, et al. These takings of property have turned our
rightful full title into legal fictional swiss cheese for the benefit of those who broker our property. Neither the Union of the States nor the States, can take or touch your property as much as they want too and already have. All my research show quite the opposite. The
highest laws and acts of the land obligate government employees to give their life's and their property to protect the property of the natural born state Citizens, not visa versa.

All of our property has been deceitfully encumbered by political and legal fiction junk constitutions, legislation, revised codes, laws, ad nauseau.

 

Blacks Law Definition of Feudal
Fee Simple Defined Black Law 1910
Blacks Law Dictionary 1910 2nd Edition Online

Jack's comments:
Wherein do you find that we were given feudal tenures replacing fee-simple ownership or allodial rights? The natural born state Citizens by virtue of the American Revolution and the territorial treaties were given land in allodium.

This allodial and fee simple ownership is absolute, unrestricted, unqualified, inviolable and immutable to your ENTIRE property.

We see the complete brake down of fundamental true and honest basic freedoms. Even the original constitutions, based on what I have seen to date, were lacking in mandating no property or labor was to be taken by the state which is required in a true and honest free limited Republic.

 

Article V Declaration of Rights, Section 11.

State of Washington Original 1878 Constitution

Section 11 is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution

"There shall never be in this state, involuntary servitude, save as punishment for crime, where the party shall have been duly convicted."

Jack's comments: any forced taxing, regulating, usury, foreclosure, zoning, permitting, condemnation, trespass and unsolicited "touching" of allodial property is involuntary servitude. This is why the "distinguished attorney" and
"distinguished delegates" took this clause out in the 1889 complete rewrite.

 

Article V. Declaration of Rights, Section 18 of the original 1878 Constitution

Section 18 is MISSING in the 1889 Constitution.

"All laws in the possession, enjoyment and decent of the property, shall be alike applicable to resident aliens and citizens."

 

Article VI. Legislative, Section 31 of the original 1878 Constitution

"The legislature shall determine WHAT PERSONS constitute the militia of the state, and may provide for organizing and disciplining the same in such manner as may be prescribed by law."

"I feel that we should place in the constitution only those provisions that are fundamental. Is it fundamental that the militia be called the National Guard for all time to come? Are the details
of the organization of the militia as set forth in the article fundamental? I challenge the chairman to show me any constitution that contains any such provision. I think this is a step toward military despotism." As a result of these objections the
article on the militia was shorn of its objectionable features, and its organization left out the legislature."

One delegate's comments undermining the intent and meaning of militia. Reference at link below. (Jack's comment)

The Origin Of The Constitution Of The State Of Washington

The United States Constitution, Article I. Section 8.

"TO PROVIDE FOR organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States
respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;.."

Jack's comments: the militia is any able bodied natural born American state Citizen who wishes to fight and die for their family, freedom, liberty, property, traditions and happiness. The legislature cannot "determine what persons" they may ONLY
"provide for.."..see quote below. Local militia groups of property owners, Citizens and their families determine who shall fight.

This is a classic example of how State pre selected political "delegates" usurp our rights one word at a time by exercising ignorance of history and/or agenda over their mandate. They have
no option but to "provide for..", vis-a-vis they cannot "determine" nor can they "may provide".

Once the local militia is taken over by the State, protection of local and individual natural born property owners private and public property is quickly removed. Sound familiar? The state
protects no one else but Herself and Her Municipal Corporate property.
The State of Washington has a net worth of some $132 billion and an annual growing revenue of 60 some billion.

A so called "representative" system represents the municipal and private corporations and their networks of associations foremost, NOT the founding and fundamental charters protecting your life, liberty and property they were charged and sworn to do.

"Senator Orrin G. Hatch & attorney (Utah) January 20, 1982,
The Subcommittee on the Constitution of the United States
Senate, of the Ninety Seventh Congress, Second Session,
report on "The Right to Keep and Bear Arms":


"Subsequent legislation in the second Congress likewise supports the interpretation of the Second Amendment that creates an individual right. In the Militia Act of 1792, the second Congress defined "militia of the United States" to include almost every free adult male in the United States. These persons were obligated by law to possess a firearm and a minimum supply of ammunition and military equipment. This statute, incidentally, remained in effect into the early years of the present century as
a legal requirement of gun ownership for most of the population of the United States. There can be little doubt from this that when the Congress and the people spoke of a "militia", they had reference to the traditional concept of the entire populace
capable of bearing arms, and not to any formal groups such as what is today called the National Guard. The purpose was to create an armed citizenry, which the political theorists at the
time considered essential to ward off tyranny. From this militia, appropriate measures might create a "well regulated militia" of individuals trained in their duties and responsibilities as
citizens and owners of firearms."

Whenever Governments Mean to Invade the Rights & Liberties of
The People, They Destroy The Militia
Freedom To Keep And Bear Arms

 

Article VI. Legislative, Section 34 of the original 1878 Constitution is also
MISSING from the 1889 Constitution.

"The legislature shall pass laws defining the personal and property rights of
married women."

Jack's comments: Women's rights were beginning to be recognized. However,
property in general continued to be increasingly confiscated. This trend in
taking property is NO accident.

 

Article VI Legislative, Section 35 of original 1878 Constitution

The privilege of the debtor to enjoy the necessary comforts of life shall be recognized by wholesome laws, exempting a reasonable amount of property from seizure or sale, for the payment of any debt or liability
hereafter contracted. 

Jack's comments: you can read the tone of the banksters and government agent interests securing their property as "creditors". We are conditioned to think usury interest, taxes and regulation are legitimate and necessary upon the natural born State Citizens, while in fact they are NOT.

Liability for illegitimate taxes, illegitimate regulations and usurious interest conflicts with the act of the American Revolution, the intent of the Declaration of Independence and the Laws of Nature and Nature's
God. The constitution of the union of the states and the individual states cannot violate these higher charters. Constitutions cannot be framed up to authorize or give jurisdiction to what these higher charters and acts of the land condemn and forbid.

Nor can they entrap natural born state Citizens into so called adhesion contracts. These takings of property are NOT necessary and fraudulent. Constitutions have been framed up to launder property, unalienable
rights and traditions into illegitimate debt, usurious interest, legal fiction codes and regulations, hich the common natural born people never agreed too.

 

Article XII Finances, Section 17. of original 1878 Constitution has been altered such as to erode its original meaning.

"Private property, shall not be taken or sold for the payment of the corporate debt of municipal corporations."

ARTICLE XI, Section 13 of 1889 "Constitution"
COUNTY, CITY, AND TOWNSHIP ORGANIZATION

" PRIVATE PROPERTY, MAY BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC DEBT. Private property shall not be taken or sold for the payment of the corporate debt of any public or municipal corporation, except in the mode provided by law for the levy and collection of taxes."

Jacks's Comments:

Note the above added extension (underlined) on the
sentence completely nullifying the original 1878 Constitution meaning. This was not amended, it was rewritten and no one knew any different.
The natural born state Citizens were not fully informed.

The municipal corporate states, counties and cities live off of a tyrannical racketeering extortion model using illegitimate and needless taxes, usurious interest and criminal regulatory confiscations of property for their profit and power.

 

Article XV. Miscellaneous, Section 10 of the original 1878 Constitution is MISSING in the 1889 version.

All patents or grants of land made by the United States to settlers and purchasers of tide lands shall be ratified and confirmed by the state.

 

 

VII. State of Washington Illegitimate 1889 "Constitution"

"The state constitutions in this country grant and limit the powers of the several epartments of government, but, generally speaking, they are not to be considered as the origin of liberty or rights. [ Ex parte Quarg, 149 Cal. 79, 84 P. 766, 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 183, 117 Am. St. Rep. 115, 9
Ann. Cas. 747; People v. Warden of City Prison, 154 App. Div. 413, 139 N.Y.S. 277, 29 N.Y.Cr. R. 66.] But with more particular reference to the rights called natural, it
must now be remarked that they exist before constitutions and independently of them. Constitutions enumerate such rights and provide against their deprivation or
infringement, but do not create them. It is supposed that all power, all rights, and all authority are vested in the people before they form or adopt a constitution."

Constitutions

"The end of law is NOT to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. But coercion remains an evil that must be minimized in a free society."

Second Treatise of Government, John Locke

 

State of Washington 1889 CONstitution

State of Washington Illegitimate 1889 "Constitution"
Washington State 1889 Constitution-black & white handwrite
This is a excellent site below which reviews the questionable signatures and pages they are written on for both the 1889 Constitutional Convention AND the 1889 Constitution.
Now compare the above to the 1878 Constitution Signatures - link below
http://www.freedomrequireswork.org/public_access/washington/const_files/1878constsigs.html

 

The 1889 "Constitution" was published and used as the root of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and the existence of this constitution was never published in the US Congressional records,
researchers can find.

Idaho Observer Freedom County, Washington and the trial of the
corporate state (MUST READ)
Washington State No Proof of Lawful Government
Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution Reject the Herd
Jack's comments: State constitutions must be published in the U.S. Congressional records. This is only one of other missing requirements with the 1889 "Constitution" to be legitimately accepted into the Union.

 

Key Excerpt From Idaho Observer Regarding Findings of Research Team

"An interesting thing happened on the way to the archives. A legal research team has uncovered ample evidence that the “1889” State Constitution published in the state's publication, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), may be the wrong constitution! Researchers found a different constitution in the State Archives. No small detail when you consider that the Constitution is the basis for the existence of government.

According to the state archivist, a lawful Constitution created in Walla Walla, was voted on and accepted by the people of Washington Territory November 5, 1878, and was lawfully submitted to Congress as the Constitution of the Washington republic as it applied to Congress for membership in the union (Art IV Sections 3 and 4 - U.S. Const.). A review of the Congressional Record confirmed that the 1878 Constitution is in fact the one submitted to Congress for membership in the union. This 1878 Constitution was published by the Senate of the United States of America as the Constitution of the Washington republic that applied for membership in the union, and was subsequently admitted as the 42nd member of the United States through the Enabling Act upon execution of the directions of the act by President Benjamin Harrison.

Will the real constitution please stand up?
The problem with the 1889 Constitution has now surfaced from another source -- the archives in Washington D.C. Several people have requested, and finally received, a certified copy of the Constitution of the State of Washington that is on record as being the official Constitution for the acceptance of Washington into the Union. It is NOT the Constitution for 1889. It appears that here is NO record of that 1889 Constitution anywhere in the archives in D.C., nor does there appear to be any evidence that the Constitution of 1889, bearing the territorial seal, was ever submitted to Congress for consideration. The 1889 Constitution has never had any legal authority to serve any function in the Union. What is on file in D.C. is a certified true complete and correct copy of the Congressionally published Constitution of the State of Washington ordained in Walla Walla, 1878. This 1878 Constitution was lawfully written into a pre-bound numbered journal, signed, ratified, voted on (by a 2-1 margin) and accepted by the people of the State of Washington in 1878. It was lawfully submitted, with territorial seal attached, published in the Congressional record and lawfully accepted by Congress under Article 4, Section 3, of the U.S. Constitution.

The research team has copies of congressional documents which unequivocally state that the “legislature” of a state and any actions of the “legislature are held in abeyance as having NO force and effect of law, until that state's constitution is presented to and published by Congress and subsequently the state is accepted into the union of states. It now appears that only the Walla Walla 1878 Constitution meets all of these criteria.

And what legislative actions are therefore void? Anything passed by a government formed under the “so-called” 1889 Constitution, i.e., the laws of the STATE OF WASHINGTON.

The 1889 Constitution -- Fact or Fiction?
There is an obvious problem with the 1889 Constitution.

The four pages of signatures -- pp. 74 -77 -- are not connected to the document. There is a blank page in between the certificate page (73) where it says, “We the undersigned” and the page (74) with NO heading where signatures begin! It is like the signatories signed a guest book, and then someone wrote a Constitution in front of the names.

Another obvious problem occurs in the certified original official Journal of the 1889 Constitutional Convention in Olympia (July 4 - August 23, 1889). It is some 520 large pages of journaling of all the minutes of the convention in a pre-bound, pre-numbered lined-pages journal book. Six of the final certificate entries for minutes were not even made to the journal until 1898 -- nine years later.

In the back of the archived journal is the first final draft of the Constitution all together. At the end of this is the certificate where it begins, “We the undersigned” and the names are properly attached on that same page. However, all the 75 undersigned names are entered into the official document journal BY THE SAME PERSON! Yes -- the same handwriting for everyone.

If the 1878 Constitution is determined to be the actual Constitution for Washington, the state, or the STATE, as the case may be, will have a significant dilemma in how to bring the current administration of the state into compliance with the 'new' (original) Constitution. This leaves many issues to be resolved, not the least of which is the fact that since none of the “offices” of current government were created by a lawful Constitution, then none of the laws passed by the unconstituted STATE OF WASHINGTON are valid, either.

All of the administrative agencies which cling to the executive branch of modern day government may find they have nowhere to attach themselves under the 1878 Constitution. The jurisdiction of the courts and the legal procedures necessary for civil and criminal court actions will have to be reviewed and brought into compliance with the 'new' Constitution. Determinations will have to be made as to reviews of prior cases for defects that do not comply with the 1878 Constitution. This could substantially alter case law which was based upon court decisions made by courts which did not lawfully exist.

Under the distribution of powers clause found in the 1878 Constitution, but not the 1889 Constitution currently used, attorneys, who are sworn officers of the court, may be prohibited from also holding office as legislators or executive officers.

Imagine a legislature without lawyers. This could provide a prime opportunity to restart a state government and bring it back to operate under constitutional mandates. Washingtonians who would like to participate in helping our “officials” work through this dilemma should call the governor, attorney general, and local representatives and offer to serve on the committees and workshops which will be necessary to accomplish this monumental task. Or start new counties, as Freedom County has done, so government by consent and according to constitutional mandates will again be the rule not the exception.

The Corporate STATE OF WASHINGTON?
As recently as the July, 1999 version of the STATE OF WASHINGTON Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), Governor Locke, in his introduction, acknowledges that STATE of WASHINGTON is a corporation, established by the UNITED STATES, a federal corporation, within Washington, D.C. Diagrams included in this report show the “branches” of the corporation to be “combined” and operating as corporate divisions, instead of separated, as required by the lawful Constitution of this state, 1878. This would seem to evidence that the STATE OF WASHINGTON is some form of corporate/administrative overlay on the geographical boundaries of Washington state. The STATE OF WASHINGTON, according to its own CAFR, is a corporation under UNITED STATES control. The 1889 Constitutional basis of its existence was fraudulently and deceptively constructed. It is not lawfully signed or recorded. The Constitutional papers were kept under wraps for some 10 years after Washington was declared to be a State. Therefore, all the laws ever written for the corporate STATE OF WASHINGTON are just that -- written for the corporate STATE OF WASHINGTON.

The quest for truth The research team has published public notices of the facts they have found in the Daily Olympian newspaper and have made public records requests to get “officials” in the STATE OF WASHINGTON to provide copies of public records to which would controvert the published evidence, specifically: court admissible evidence of any kind which would tend to prove:

1) that a Constitutional Convention could lawfully have been called after the legislative session had ended, and prior to October 1, 1889;

2) that a Constitutional Convention was actually called during 1889, and completed a constitution prior to October 1, 1889;

3) that any constitution for Washington was actually submitted to Congress for admission of Washington to the union other than the constitution approved by the People for the Washington republic November 5, 1878;

4) that the Constitution voted upon in 1889 was any other constitution than the constitution initially adopted November 5, 1878;

5) that the constitution (excluding amendments) published in Volume 0, Revised Code of Washington, was in existence and published prior to 1898;

6) that the “signatures” appearing on the State Archivist's records of the purported “1889 Constitutional Convention” constitution, all of which appear to be written by only two people, are not forgeries;

7) that Congress accepted the “1889 Constitution” into its records for action on the bills providing for the admission of Washington to the union; and

8) court admissible evidence of any kind which would tend to controvert the published evidence that the People of Washington's application to congress for membership in the union was related to any constitution other than that constitution approved by the People on November 5, 1878.

This public records request was sent to many “public officials” in the “STATE OF WASHINGTON.” One member of the research team received a response back from Governor GARY LOCKE, stating “We have no documents responsive to your public records request dated October 17, 2000.”

Certified Documents from the National Archives of Washington D.C. showing the only and the real Constitution of the State of Washington (1878) seems to provide evidence that even the governor cannot controvert, that the current STATE OF WASHINGTON government does not lawfully exist. Who's got the substantive evidence of origin?
Will this newly discovered constitutional republic of Washington replace the corporate STATE OF WASHINGTON? Or will it fall to the same fate as many other “discoveries” in the great fraud of government. Like the probably ratified, original 13th “titles of nobility” Amendment, which was never repealed but somehow has all but vanished save for a few traces in various state archives. Or the 16th and 17th Amendments which certifiably have never been ratified, yet are published as part of the current federal Constitution. Or the Republic of Texas, where similar research in their “state” archives discovered that Texas has never been admitted to the union as one of the United States.

Without a meaningful opportunity to present the proof, the corporate overlays of modern administrative government keep rolling along, the truth be damned. And then there is the political challenge of getting the people to accept the fact that they have been defrauded for 111 years. That won't be easy.

The evidence regarding the two Constitutions has been published in the Pierce county records, Auditor's file #200009130560. Copies may be obtained from the Auditor's Office by calling 253-798-7427 for copy information.

For more info on the 1878 Constitution discoveries, contact Don Braun at: 206-440-1938 mailto:jd.consultants@juno.com
For more info on Freedom County, contact Commissioner Thom Saterlee at: 360-435-5979 mailto:freedomcounty@earthlink.net
***
Mr. Heath is a regular columinst for The Idaho Observer who has mastered the art of wrestling complex subject matter into a format that ordinary people can understand.

Idaho Observer Freedom County, Washington and the trial of the corporate state

 

 

Regarding the new 1889 "Constitution"

"The debates and proceedings of the convention were never published."

The following document, linked below, is a thesis of a student for a Master of Arts degree in the University of Washington.

"The debates and proceedings of the convention were never published. Mr. Lebbeus J. Knapp gleaned information from survivors of the convention
and newspapers of that day."

The Origin Of The Constitution Of The State Of Washington

"There were stenographic notes taken of the proceedings of the convention but were never published. They should be for the use of lawyers and courts and all others interested, for, in the rendition of judgments, the bare reading of the words of the constitution gives rise to divided opinions as to the actual meaning contained therein, and, in instances of the kind, it is always the practice of the legal profession to procure information of the intent of
the framers of the constitution. To the average lay mind the importance of securing at first hand the "intent" of the constitutional convention may not appear of so much importance, but every lawyer in the state will appreciate
the value it will be to the courts. Outside of this, however, the general public would be interested in learning the influence brought to bear on us in forming the different sections."

The Origin Of The Constitution Of The State Of Washington

This same secrecy occurred during the highly controversial colonial constitutional conventions between 1786 - 1790. If it was not for one man, Jonathan Elliot, we would never know what happen behind those closed doors in Philadelphia. Even his notes were covered up for some 46 years.
A Treatise On the Corruption of the Constitutional Conventions in the Several States

 

Extract from a UW student's Masters of Arts Thesis re. the new 1889 State of Washington Constitution".

"A very distinguished lawyer chosen by the state prepared the full draft of the constitution taken from the organic laws of Oregon, Wisconsin and Iowa, supplemented with such original Clauses as many years of experience in legislation and the interpretation of laws led him to consider desirable in a state constitution, while no part of the document prepared by Mr. Hill was adopted verbatim. Its source and merit were such that it received the unbiased consideration of the
members of the convention, and it probably contributed more to the finished product as adopted by the convention than any other written document. Mr. Hill's draft of a constitution was published on July 4,
the date of the convening of the convention; it at once attracted the attention of all members, and copies of it were eagerly sought and read by the members present." pg. 17

The Origin of the Constitution of the State of Washington

"The specific work of the convention may be summarized as follows: It met simultaneously with the constitutional conventions of Montana, Idaho, North Dakota and South Dakota." Pg. 26

The Origin of the Constitution of the State of Washington

Jack' comments:
One lawyer drafted the 1889 State of Washington Constitution using boiler plate wording from three other state constitutions which were also probably written by other "very distinguished lawyers" along with "many years of experience" from preceding states.

The stark differences in the two Washington State constitutions (1878 & 1889) is as if the 1878 version was involved less by state appointed attorneys and the 1889 version was written entirely by one.

American's have idolized "their" "constitutions" into literal states of romantic whimsy which have NO connection to the highest laws of the land which condemned most of these takings, i.e. the Declaration of Independence and the act of the American Revolution and the Laws of Nature and Nature's God.

 

re. the new 1889 "Constitution"

The four pages of signatures in the 1889 "Constitution" are not connected to the document and there is no heading where the signatures begin. There is a blank page in-between the end of the document and the Certificate "We, the undersigned". It's like they got the signatures from somewhere else and wrote a "Constitution" in front of the names.

Idaho Observer Freedom County, Washington and the trial of the
corporate state
FreedomForAllSeasons Comment: I do not see the signature of the then Territorial Governor Miles C. Moore on any of the 4 pages or of his predessor Territorial Governor Eugene Semple who left pre April 9, 1889.

 

Mr. Voorhees. "Mr. Speaker, in response to the observations of the chairman of the Committee on Territories, I desire to state that Washington did adopt a constitution in 1878, and the only reason we are
not before Congress today asking for action upon that constitution is that, because of the policy of non-action which has characterized Congress in connection with this matter, we have grown away from the constitution made in 1878. For that reason, and for that reason alone, we are not here with a constitution." Congressional Record - House January 28, 1879

Mr. Voorhees is Senator Daniel W. Voorhees of Indiana (D)

Jack's comments: One comment made regarding why the 11 year delay between 1878 and 1889 constitutions, was the U.S. House was controlled by the Democrats and the Territory of Washington was Republican
during this time. The data and link below appear to confirm this. Of the 7 terms during this period, the Democrats controlled the House 5 times. In the Senate, the Republicans controlled or were even with the
Democrats 5 times. The Republicans controlled the Office of the President 5 terms. There was a window during 1881-1883 when the U.S. House, Senate and Executive office were Republican, however it appears
no action was taken?

Link here to see historical chronology of political parties controlling U.S. House, Senate and Executive
Washington State No Proof of Lawful Government

 

re. the new 1889 "Constitution"

"In reply to the first proposition, I find upon a careful examination of those solutions of the revised statutes of the United States which vest the executive power of a territory in the governor, that no authorization exists therein which empower the executive to call such convention by proclamation or otherwise."

"In none of the above material sections, nor in any other statute that I have examined, can I find even a semblance of authority empowering the governor to call a constitutional convention by the exercise of any prerogative consequent upon his executive power."

Attorney General Washington Territory J. B. Metcalfe

Shortly after January 26, 1889

Washington State No Proof of Lawful Government

 

Article I. Legislative, Declaration of Rights, Section 31, 1889 Constitutions and current Amended

"No standing army shall be kept up by this state in time of peace, and no
soldier shall in time of peace be quartered in any house without the consent
of its owner, nor in time of war except in the manner prescribed by law."

Jack's comment: In Washington State, we have federal military troops occupying Ft. Lewis & McChord AFB and the Bangor submarine base all reporting to the President in Washington D.C. Inc. The State National Guard are currently under the State Governor. Ex Governor Locke has let slip in one of the prior CAFR's, that the "State" of Washington is a corporation under the District of Columbia. According to one National Guard officer I spoke too, there have been at least one attempt to nationalize the State National Guard units under the Office of the President.

We all remember New Orleans with the handcuffing of home owners, et al.

 

Article IV. The Judiciary - 1889 2nd Constitution & Amended Constitution
SECTION 16 CHARGING JURIES.
"Judges shall not charge juries with respect to matters of fact, nor comment
thereon, but shall declare the law."
Article 5. Declaration of Rights
Section 7. Freedom of Speech - Original 1878 Constitution
"Every person may freely speak write and publish his opinions on all subjects being responsible for the abuse of that liberty; and no laws shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press. In all prosecutions for libel, the truth may be given in evidence to the jury, and if it appears that the matter charged a libelous be true, and was published with good motives and justifiable ends, the party
accused shall be acquitted; and the jury shall have the right to
determine the law and the fact."

Article I. Declaration of Rights
Section 5. Freedom of Speech - 2nd 1889 Constitution
"Every person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right."

Jack's comments:
Notice the right of the jury to determine the law and the fact is gone in the second 1889 Constitution and the much stronger wording of the 1878 original Constitution protecting freedom of speech.

Jack's comments:

Notice that there is no wording in the current 2nd state of Washington Constitution confirming the jury has the right to decide the law and fact for libel and/or criminal cases.

According to "The History Of American Constitutional or Common Law" by Dale Pond, et al, (pgs. 104 - 126) many state constitutions including Maryland & Wyoming, declare juries shall decide the law and fact in criminal cases but other state constitutions limit these natural rights to libel cases only.

 

Article VII. Revenue and Taxation, State of Washington 1889 Constitution, Amended some 100 times

"The word "property" as used herein shall mean and include everything whether tangible or intangible, subject to ownership. All real estate shall constitute one class: "

Jack's comments:

The so called "delegates" of the second "more illegitimate" undocumented convention have also "exceeded their power by very far" not unlike the accusation during the original constitutional conventions. Very limited Constitutional Republic's, cannot draft rape, pillage and plunder into even a legitimate constitution. Would you tell "your delegate" they could take"everything"? This is political corruption at it finest. The Political territorial elite brokering away your life, liberty, freedom including but NOT limited to your property and wages. No natural born Citizens have a clue. The chosen
few "delegates" have gone along to get along, for your sake of course.

This is another example how the union has exceeded their powers:

"In 2005 the Gold Anti-trust Action Committee sent a letter to the U.S. Treasury Department asking about the risk of gold confiscation.  In its return letter, the Treasury Department asserted its right not only to confiscate
precious metals and restrict ownership of mining shares, but to confiscate and restrict every other financial asset as well.


If you are truly concerned about government confiscation, you need to ensure that your sheriff and state attorney general are committed to protect your constitutional and property rights within their jurisdictions."

Catherine Austin Fitts - http://solari.com/solari_silver_gold/FAQ/#fractional

Jack's comments:

Catherine Austin Fits comments shown to give you the enormity of the taking.

 

"Just what is meant by the Republican form of government guaranteed by the federal constitution is NOT clear. It was surely not pure democracy. The history and experience of the past gave the framers of the federal constitution little ground for faith in the stability and security of unlimited democracy." Lebbeus J. Knapp, source link below
The Origin Of The Constitution Of The State Of Washington

 

The Taking of Private Property for Public Use

"Most of the constitutions now in force prohibit the taking of private property for public use without compensation, BUT experience has demonstrated that such a general provision is entirely inadequate to prevent great injustice, and often the most
serious oppression.

The taking of private property in many cases is of even less consequence than the injuries inflicted by the use of adjacent property; so, in many state constitutions, provision is made for the that class of cases by adding the words :or damaged.", in order
that the rights of the individual to the enjoyment of his possessions shall not be invaded and he be wrongfully deprived of his property by measures not falling literally within the prohibition
against taking private property."

The Origin of the Constitution of the State of Washington

 

VIII. The Enabling Act

ENABLING ACT

" AN ACT to provide for the division of Dakota into two States and to enable the people of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Washington to form constitutions and State governments and to be admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States,
and to make donations of public lands to each States.

....And IF the constitutions and governments of said proposed States are republican in form, AND IF ALL the provisions of this act have been complied with in the formation thereof, it shall be the duty of the President of the United States to issue his proclamation nnouncing the result of ....."

Approved February 22, 1889. 25 U.S. Statutes at Large, c 180 p 676. President's proclamation declaring Washington a state: 26 St. at Large, Proclamations, p 10, Nov. 11, 1889.

Following paragraph from above Enabling Act

"Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the inhabitants of
all that part of the area of the United States now constituting the Territories of Dakota, Montana, and Washington, as at present described, MAY become the States of North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Washington, respectively,, as hereinafter provided."
Approved February 22, 1889

"The research team has copies of congressional documents which unequivocally state that the legislature of a state and any actions of the legislature are held in abeyance as saving NO force of law, until that states's constitution is presented to and published by Congress and subsequently the state is accepted into the union of states. It now appears that only the Walla Walla 1878 Constitution meets all of these criteria." (see reference in link below)

Idaho Observer Freedom County, Washington
and the trial of the corporate state
North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Washington Enabling Act

 

IX. State of Washington ConstitutionS Chronology -

Leading up too, through and after the two "constitutions"

 

State of Washington CON CHRON

Click on Table above to view full size spread sheet

 

X. Your State's Relative Enslavement Index

America State Legislative Freedom Index

Credit to http://www.thirty-thousand.org/
Click on graph or here to see page 19 of study

"The incorporation of cities and towns by special act of the legislature, has, in many instances, proven to be a fountain of evil in the states where it prevails. There is no branch of government more completely adapted to the purposes of those who make the filthiest a trade than the manipulation of city charters, where their enactment is controlled by special laws."

"The Origin of The Constitution of The State of Washington", by Lebbeus J. Knapp, page 16. This report was prepared as a thesis for the Master of Arts degree in the University of Washington. The debates and proceedings of the convention were never published. Mr. Knapp gleaned information from survivors of the convention and newspapers of that day. Link directly below.

Mr. Kinnear was a member of the Constitutional
Convention and was Chairman of the Committee on Corporations other than Municipal."

Jack's comments: I have long researched the historical justification of power of the city and county councils, mayors and executives.

Bottom line, the natural born did NOT give them this power.

The dark side of municipal corporations have not only "exceeded their power by very far", they have fabricated absurdities and atrocities against property and business owners which ONLY apply to the
employees of the municipal corporations themselves . How ironic and karmic is this hard truth? This trick is another cookie cutter shell game used throughout the conventions.

Once YOU have this enlightenment and make this mental shift of power from them to YOU, you have the truth. YOU and WE never gave them that power, i.e. they stole it.

True and honest Constitutional Republics or Consolidated Republics, prevent and severely punish this empire building. Again, we see the lineage of these type of takings threading to the British monarchy
feudal tyranny. This negative heritage was severed after the success of the American Revolution in the Battle of Yorktown in October 19, 1781, as well the treaties acquiring all other American territories.

 

 

 

XI. Directly Related Material - Must Read - Some Overlap

Idaho Observer Freedom County, Washington and the trial of the corporate state

 

 

XII. Indirectly Connecting Material -

To better visualize the BIG picture on the cover of the puzzle box read this material

2013-02-07 Washington Counties 1880

(Credit to http://freedomrequireswork.org/public_access/washington/washington_counties_1880.pdf)

Open Letter to the State of Washington
(Jack comments to the State, King County & City of Enumclaw)
Free or Slaves (Must Read)
Holodeck Law (Must Read) (Must Read by a HONEST Lawyer)
Total-Eclipse-Of-Freedom ( Must See 500 Page Online Book 4 MB file)

 

 

XIII. Conclusion

The taking of property can only be understood once you have the big picture in mind. Before you assemble the pieces of a complex puzzle, it helps to see the picture on the cover of the puzzle box first. This web site is that picture on the cover. Here is more essential research designed to help YOU see this picture.

 

Constitutional Republic v. Democracy

 

A Republic, by definition, has two principle elements,

First, it is controlled by Law, therefore it does not control Law.

Second, it recognizes the private independent sovereign nature of each person (man or woman) of competent age and capacity, therefore a Republic must be representative in its nature.

A Republic recognizes Law is unchangeable, or at least that it can only be changed by a higher source than government.  In a Republic the concept of “collective sovereignty” cannot exist, except with recognition that the State or nation, as a body of sovereigns, can speak through one elected voice;  though that one voice can never lawfully interfere with the private rights of the individual sovereigns.

“A Constitutional Republic” is a government created and controlled, at least, by the Law of a Constitution.  The Constitution of the United States of America was, in Law, foundationally based on the Bible, the Magna Charta, and The Declaration of IndependenceThose documents recognize man’s sovereignty, the divine nature of man’s creation and
man’s divine right to Life, Liberty, Property, and the pursuit of
happiness.

Team Law http://www.teamlaw.org/Government/ConstitutionalRepublic.htm

Constitution of the United States of America

Article IV. Section. 4. The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.

 

Constitutional Republic v. Democracy

 

Jack's Summary Comments:
1. "Neither State of Washington "Constitutions", 1878 or 1889 or the current 2010 Constitution amended some 100 times, meet the hard and honest standards of a true and honest Constitutional Republic.
2. These so called "constitutions" are framed more as a combination of majority rule democracies PLUS municipal corporation bylaws yielding constitutional gulags.
3. Constitutions and constitutional conventions are NOT to be framed or set up based on consensus of any class of people or special interest groups nor are they to be used as an opportunity for political and legal elite's to frame up their favorite infrastructure to take property or power away from the sovereign natural born state Citizens.
4. A Constitutional Republic is defined in the simple table above. The natural born state Citizen is THE "Individual" who is sovereign and free by their Creator NOT by the elite or majority or minority or
government employees AND most certainly NOT by any county or city municipal corporation or council. True and honest constitutions are framed on very clear and high standards set by the Laws of Nature
and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the action and success of the American Revolution.
5. As a result of this study and near 6 years of research, ALL of the 50 several "state""constitutions" are NOT Constitutional Republics in any sense of the true and honest meaning. We have been fed junk science before and well know the taste and smell. We are now staring at junk constitutional political AND legal agenda contrived by those benefiting associations. This is a massive taking and a very intentional manipulation into constitutional gulags which have the appearance
of a Constitutional Republic but are in fact tyrannical municipal corporations.
6. The territories used prior state constitutions as boiler plates chosen intentionally from other preselected "states" by hand picked "prominent public minded" attorney(s) who were also chosen by prominent territorial governors and their like minded politicians.

The territorial governor and their parties rallied "prominent and like minded delegates" of choice to a "constitutional convention". Therein, they offer up standard predetermined drafts of constitutions, using
politically chosen "very distinguished lawyer(s)" to lead people down a path of state tyranny NOT individual sovereignty and freedom.

This Pied Piper taking of property worked over 50 times. These are mock conventions and constitutions, not true and honest constitutions.
7. The 50 several "independent states" have become more demographic regional overlays of an extremely demonic D.C. Inc. global and syndicated municipal corporations which thread through some 60 other countries. These corporations are roughly 1/4
"government" or less, 1/4 corporation or more and 1/2 syndicated international criminal cartels or more, who operate under deception, de facto legal, monetary, political ad financial fiction using tyranny by
controlling the currency and printing presses along with media and the printing presses for schools and academia.
8. This pattern of corrupted constitutional conventions and constitutions has been going on since the original "constitutional conventions" of the several states in 1787.

British Columbia, Canada is also rumored to have no constitution. This puts an entire new meaning on the so called "sustainable development" mantra " think global and take local".

9. Coming up - Next web site documentary will be on the State of
Washington and King County Municipal Corporations Consolidated Annual Financial Reports (CAFR) and how the State {that never was} has accumulated massive wealth of some $62 billion annual gross
revenue with a net worth of some 132 billion and growing. All while telling you they have "deficit", i.e. they did not steal from you what they wanted.

The State of Washington Municipal Corporation is far more wealthy and powerful than The Boeing Company. The Boeing Company after some 100 years finally woke up. Boeing could NOT compete with the
State of Washington municipal corporation so they bid themselves out to a much higher bidder.

The states need NO direct taxes, NO till taxes or NO income taxes of any kind upon the natural born State Citizens or the natural born property owners. Does a mob need to extort the local merchants to stay
in business?

 

A Treatise on the Corruption of Constitutional Conventions in the
Several States

Please read/scan this treatise, if you haven't already done so. Part of the constitutional big picture is to grasp how the "delegates" of the several states and the Federalist leaders far exceeded any power or
authority given to them by the common people. The common people did not vote, nor did their Republic's or Commonwealth's for such a massive centralization of power and property. Does this sound familiar?

This same Ole "constitutional" shell game has been rolling through each territory and their ensuing states since. Another name for this game is "Bait and Switch".

 

A Treatise on the Corruption of USConstitutional Conventions Abstract

 

The corruption of the original U.S. constitutional conventions was not uncommon of the politics used by the British to secure their interests in holding their colonies in line. The American politicians, British
educated lawyers and bankers learned these ways of holding agenda "conventions" to draft "constitutions"to manipulate the political infrastructure of the several states as well as the future territories.


We have a "Constitutional Republic" in name only.

FreedomForAllSeasons

 

XIV. Labor, Property, Taxes And The Natural Born State Citizen

1883: Butchers' Union Co. v. Crescent City Co., 111 U.S. 746.

This decision defines labor as property, and the most sacred kind of property. "Among these unalienable rights, as proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is meant, the right any lawful business or vocation, in any manner not
inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculties, so as to give them their highest enjoyment...It has been well said that, THE PROPERTY WHICH EVERY MAN HAS IS HIS OWN LABOR, AS IT IS THE ORIGINAL FOUNDATION OF ALL OTHER PROPERTY SO IT IS THE MOST SACRED AND INVIOLABLE..."

(Reference link below Supreme Court Cases..)

INVIOLABLE:

1. The attribute of being secured against violation.
Blacks Law Dictionary 1910 2nd Edition

2. Free from violation, injury, desecration, or outrage, undisturbed or untouched, unbroken, not infringes.
The Random House Dictionary College Ed.

 

Legitimate v Illegitimate Tax Table

Click on Table For Full View

 

This is why direct taxing, regulating, coding, permitting, licensing or taking of labor and property are absolutely immoral, illegitimate and treasonous. The taking of private property ultimately collapses the civilizations using such feudal and barbaric greed. Constitutional Republics and free societies NEVER give their legal fiction bodies, e.g. government or municipal corporations this power, authority or jurisdiction.
1. Jesus Christ clearly stated he was against direct taxing of the Sons & Daughters in their own land.
2. The Laws of Nature and Nature's God forbid direct taxing of labor and property.
3. The delegates to the original constitutional conventions voted no direct tax but it was fraudulently written in against their wishes. Also the constitution for the union of the states was never approved by the colonial people nor their respective Republics and Commonwealths.
4. The Declaration of Independence was against tyrannical forced taxing.
5. The action, intent and success of the American Revolution freed us from feudal land and labor taxing and controlling tyranny, i.e. we revolted because of forced taxing.
6. At least three state high courts have ruled current property taxes are unconstitutional because they are not apportioned evenly. If they are unconstitutional in one state, they are unconstitutional in all states because each state constitution points to the original constitution. State constitutions are subordinate to the union of the several states constitution.
7. Supreme Court Cases re. Taxes on Labor - American Case history establishing labor is property and both labor and property cannot be taxed:
8. Washington State Supreme Court declares citizen approved state income tax unconstitutional.
9. Freedom From Tax Tyranny

 

"I agree with you concerning the tax burden and its ultimate destruction of this country...I did not run for re-election as Mayor of Salt Lake City because of the feeling that Washington is slowly but surely taking over the operation of the states
through the so-called furnishing of tax-dollars from Washington. I retired as Mayor of Salt Lake City on January 3, 1972, and do not again intend to seek public office."

Bracken Lee

 

XV. Consolidated Annual Financial Reports - The Massive Wealth of the States

Jack's comments:

If all of the above does not boil your blood AND you still believe in the status quo, then here is more proof of the municipal Mother of all embezzlements and larceny.

The states and THEIR municipal corporations (cities and counties) are required even by their own self protective denial, to publish CAFR accounting of THEIR assets, revenue, debt and resulting net worth.

NET WORTH = ASSETS - LIABILITY

Read about the massive reserve on hand cash in the State of Oregon below. The State of Washington is no piker either. "The State of Washington", a subsidiary to Washington D.C. Municipal Corporation, a.k.a. USA Inc. has accumulated $132 billion of Net Worth and $62 billion in annual revenue and growing.

No direct or indirect taxing of the natural born state Citizens is necessary. All direct AND indirect taxing upon the natural born, sovereign and free state Citizens goes against the fundamental laws of the land, i.e. the Laws of Nature and Nature's God, the Declaration of Independence and the success and spirit of the first American Revolution. All forms of taxing upon the natural born is unnecessary, repressive and destructive.

"Of course there is LAW in this country (Larceny And Willingness)

Did you hug your local government appointed or elected attorney today that are running the complete show in Government at this time?

If not, you probably had good probable cause not to."

Walter Burien - CAFR1

TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason?
For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612

The Godfather's World - YOUR World (Catherine Austin Fitts)
Devvy Kidd -- Are the states really broke or hiding assets
http://www.cafr1.com/
http://www.taxretirement.com/
http://cafrman.com/

 

 

XVI. Common Sense Revisited

Common Sense Revisited (47 Page PDF Must Read Magazine)

 

XVII. Son of the Republic Look and Learn

 

General Washington at Valley Forge General Washington Riding Valley Forge

 

Son of the Republic Look and Learn - The Vision of George Washington (click)

"The scene instantly began to fade and dissolve, and I at last saw nothing but the rising, curling vapor, I at first beheld. This also disappeared, and I found myself once more gazing upon the mysterious visitor who, in the same voice I heard before said,

"Son of the Republic, what you have seen is thus interpreted: Three great perils will come upon the Republic. The most fearful for her is the third. But the whole world united shall not prevail against her. Let every child of the Republic learn to live for
his God, his land and Union."


With these words the vision vanished, and I started from my seat and felt that I had seen a vision wherein had been showed me the birth, progress, and destiny of the United States."

Jack's comments: I am convinced, this third and greatest peril of General Washington's prophetic vision regarding America, is the "silent" war we are currently in. A vast spider web of maniacal municipal corporations, including the states, have been bound up by illegitimate debt, monetary treason, tax fraud, usury fraud, and
regulatory fraud to the highest levels threading to the national and global power brokers.

 

XVIII. Key Material To Read/Handout (PDF reports may be sent to nearest copy center)

Must Read Reports -
To Better Understand How We Have Been Enslaved By Submitting To Slavish Beliefs
A Treatise on the Corruption of the Constitutional Conventions
in the Several States (Enhanced) (Pages 37)
Weapons of Mass Destruction Found - Part 1 (46 Pages) by Michael Tsarion
Weapons of Mass Destruction Found - Part 2 (The Constitution Con) (63 Pages)
Lysander Spooner - No Treason No. 1 (10 Pages)
Lysander Spooner - No Treason No. 2 (13 Pages)
Lysander Spooner - No Treason No. 6 - The Constitution of No Authority (44 Pages)
Lysander Spooner - Letter to Grover Cleveland (89 Pages)
268 Single Pages Total or 134 double sided
Must Read Books to understand how the natural born have been taken
Hologram of Liberty by Kenneth W. Royce
The CONstitution That Never Was by Ralph Boryszwski
Our CONstitution The Myth that Binds Us by Eric Black
Unalienable Rights And The Denial Of The U.S. Constitution by Michael E. LeMieux
Lost Rights The Destruction of American Liberty by James Bovard
Friends, Enemies and the die-hard Doubters
Handbook of American Constitutional Law

 

Don’t Go There With Me – Ever Again (Jack's Warning in Prose via PowerPoint and Guitar)

 

End of Property Rights in Australia and the rest of the Free World -
How they Cooked Their Constitution too

 

 

Click on your hat and saddle to ride back to the barn, partner

 

Compiled by Jack Venrick

The Ranch at Freedom For All Seasons BARJRV

Enumclaw, Washington - the state That Never Was

jacksranch at freedomforallseasons dot org